unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #08177
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
On 25. feb. 2012 18:36, Adrian Maier wrote:
It's possible , but not comfortable . Using the filters requires too
much clicking (see below) .
The problem is the high number of clicks needed to have the job done :
- click on dash ,
- click on "search applications" ,
- click on "Filters" ,
- click on "Local Apps" ,
- click on "Games" ,
- click on "see more results"
I don't understand what those steps should lead to. Why would you click
on "search applications" or "local apps"? I mean, currently, there's
only one other scope, which is the software center. Those results will
be displayed below. I don't understand why that should disrupt anything.
However, you should have access to your online games from there are
well. Wouldn't you say?
The "available applications" scope can be permanently deactivated if you
want to. Set /desktop/unity/lenses/applications/display-available-apps
to False in dconf-editor, and you'll never see them again. You won't
even see it as a source in filters. In the same place, you can also
deactivate showing your recently used applications, which might make
sense now that they are displayed in the dash.
So; once during the lifetime of the session, you need to click "see more
results". After that, you won't have to click it again until you log
out. I've proposed that it should be remembered between sessions as
well, which would completely eliminate issue. I personally don't see one
click per session as a huge problem, but it might be slightly more
comfortable.
So we're left with something more like this:
* Right click Ubuntu and select Applications.
* Click games
* Click Wesnoth.
That's not so bad, is it? Of course the best way would be to press
super, enter "we" and press enter. But we should have some fairly
comfortable ways of using the mouse as well.
After doing all those clicks I am finally getting the complete list of
Games. Clicking 6 times for seeing all the installed Games is way too
much.
Yes, and currently, one is completely unnecessary, two must only be done
once during the lifetime of the session. Filters are visible until you
hide them. Scopes are selected until you change that selection. (And can
be deactivated permanently if you wish to) The results are expanded
until you collapse them again. So, in practice, except for the first
time, that means one click more than using Gnome menubar.
My proposal was that this should be remembered between sessions as well,
which would mean once during the lifetime of the user account.
If I want to move to another category it's necessary to click 2 times :
- click on "Games" to unselect it
- click on "Internet"
Right. I think that's unnecessary. In the meantime, it would be very
simple to add a middle-click to select and unselect in one go, for
instance. Or opposite; middle-click to select more than one category,
since that probably isn't the most common intention. That is somewhat
inconsistent as well. In Nautilus, for instance, left clicking another
entry will select that and unselect the previous selections, unless you
use some kind of modifier. For that reason, I consider that a bug.
Therefore I tend to agree with the people who mentioned that the Dash
is designed for search , not for apps navigation in directory-style .
Navigation inside the Dash could be improved a bit if the changes
mentioned by Omar were implemented.
Yes, for rarely used things, search is preferred. Everything that's
frequently used will be accessible with two clicks. For the more rare
situations when you have to browse, there is a solution as well and I
don't think it's fairly accessible. It obviously supports a lot more
possibilities than the old menus could ever, such as online applications
and games. So even if it were marginally less comfortable for local
applications – which I don't think it necessarily has to be – it would
still be worth it.
By the way : i have also tried it "the Unity way " .
- press Super , to open the dash
- type "games"
- it shows me only "Aisleriot Solitaire "
- if i type "game"
- it shows me 2 games : "Aisleriot Solitaire " and "Freecell Solitaire"
Actually there are 2 more games installed : Mahjongg and Minesweeper.
Not impressed at all about these search results. Hopefully this is
just a bug in the 12.04 beta .
Well, on my own computer, I usually know what games I have installed. If
I want to play PokerTH, for instance, then I press super, enter "po" and
press enter. I don't first search for games, then browse the available
games and then click on PokerTH. If I wanted to play Solitaire, then I
would press super, enter "so" and press enter. I have never typed the
name of a category, and I don't understand why I would wish to do so, at
least until we get scopes for online apps, games, etc.
"the feature" = navigate applications in a directory-style in an
easy, comfortable way .
I don't think that's going to happen, because increasingly uncommon for
people to have all their applications installed. Many of the
applications people use are browser-apps. Having a hierarchical menu of
tens of thousands of applications simply wouldn't work. That's the
reason why we no longer use a directory to navigate the web, like we did
in the early days, but instead use search engines. But I also don't
understand why a hierarchical display is more comfortable, except out of
old habit. We know that the old menu is very much more difficult to use
for a large number of people, because it requires far greater accuracy
with the mouse, for instance.
By easy I mean : no unnecessary clicks, and possibility to go from
one category to another with at most 1 click (preferably 0 clicks :
mouse hover) .
Switching by default instead of multi-select would be an improvement.
Selecting by hover simply wouldn't work. Consider selecting "Graphics"
on hover, for instance. Sure, you would display applications from that
category, but then how would you be able to launch any of them without
selecting a different category on your way there? While not
theoretically impossible, it would be extremely difficult.
It can be a classic apps menu , or can be an improved Dash , or
can be some new fancy-looking categories browser that allows easy
navigation .
It is important to remember that "easy" is very subjective. You seem to
be of the opinion that Gnome menubar was easier, for instance. But for
someone with Parkinson's disease, it may be very much more difficult,
since a shivering hand will often cause you to enter the wrong category,
etc. A very large number of people have those kinds of problems. This
doesn't affect you and me, but it still needs to be taken into account
when doing general design.
It indicates that I no longer intend to spend too much energy with
discussing on this topic .
From my point of view the issue is solved : now I am aware about
several possibilities that will allow me to happily use Unity without
cursing every 5 minutes .
Sure. There's lots of good software on the internet that you can install
and use in Ubuntu. But the point was simply that this is the Unity
Design mailinglist and should probably be somewhat limited to Unity
design, and not any third-party application that can be installed on
Ubuntu.
--
Jo-Erlend Schinstad
References
-
Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Omar B ., 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Omar B ., 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Michael Hall, 2012-02-24
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-25