unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #08188
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 20:58, Ian Santopietro <isantop@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Directory based navigation is a bad concept for modern computing. Not even
> Windows is holding on to that in Windows 8. Users don't care about folders
> or files. They only want to interact with data.
Well, in this case i have some bad old news for them : data is stored
in files. And files are organized in directories. If some users
prefer to put all of their files in a single directory (for example
"on the desktop") this is nothing but a bad practice.
> The number of clicks in this case is completely irrelevant. If the user is
> in a hurry, they will know what they want and use search or a launcher
> shortcut. If they want to browse through the applications installed, then
> the number of clicks doesn't matter. They aren't in a hurry to get work
> done, and individual clicks aren't hard or time consuming in this scenario.
I don't agree, but whatever ...
> On Feb 25, 2012 10:37 AM, "Adrian Maier" <syraxes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 17:52, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
>> <joerlend.schinstad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On 25. feb. 2012 16:38, Adrian Maier wrote:
>> >>
>> >> There is a possibility to browse by categories. I know that you know
>> >> this.
>> >> Perhaps you should explain why Windows' way of doing it is better?
>> >> Because they've found a way to add an improvement (search applications
>> >> by name) without removing the traditional folder-based navigation of
>> >> "All Programs" .
>> >
>> > Yes, but you're still not explaining why that would be better.
>>
>> I don't think it's possible to convince you about that.
>>
>> >> It isn't missing. It works a little bit different than what you're used
>> >> to,
>> >> but it does exist.
>> >> Michael Hall was saying that the Dash is designed for searching , not
>> >> for browsing the applications. This explains why it's not the
>> >> feature that i was looking for.
>> >>
>> >> But you are the one who told me that in order to get a classic-looking
>> >> apps menu it's possible to load the gnome panel !
>> >>
>> >> Therefore : in Unity itself there is no component designed/intended
>> >> to act as a category-based browser .
>> >
>> > We have that. Just used filters. The preferred way of launching stuff is
>> > not
>> > to browse for them, but to quickly launch them using either the list of
>> > frequent applications or to search. But browsing by category is
>> > certainly
>> > possible.
>>
>> It's possible , but not comfortable . Using the filters requires too
>> much clicking (see below) .
>>
>>
>> >>>> The first step would be to see that the need for such a feature is at
>> >>>> least acknowledged.
>> >>>
>> >>> Then you have to be more convincing. So far, you've claimed that it is
>> >>> required, but I don't think you've explained why. To me, it sounds as
>> >>> if
>> >>> you
>> >>> want to change the behavior because you're not used to it.
>> >>
>> >> Please enlighten me : from your point of view the feature is already
>> >> there , or you want me to demonstrate why should it be introduced ?
>> >
>> > You open the applications lens and then choose the category you want. I
>> > don't really understand the problem, which is why I keep asking you for
>> > an
>> > explanation. But you don't provide any.
>>
>>
>> The problem is the high number of clicks needed to have the job done :
>> - click on dash ,
>> - click on "search applications" ,
>> - click on "Filters" ,
>> - click on "Local Apps" ,
>> - click on "Games" ,
>> - click on "see more results"
>> After doing all those clicks I am finally getting the complete list of
>> Games. Clicking 6 times for seeing all the installed Games is way too
>> much.
>>
>> If I want to move to another category it's necessary to click 2 times :
>> - click on "Games" to unselect it
>> - click on "Internet"
>>
>> Therefore I tend to agree with the people who mentioned that the Dash
>> is designed for search , not for apps navigation in directory-style .
>> Navigation inside the Dash could be improved a bit if the changes
>> mentioned by Omar were implemented.
>>
>>
>>
>> By the way : i have also tried it "the Unity way " .
>> - press Super , to open the dash
>> - type "games"
>> - it shows me only "Aisleriot Solitaire "
>>
>> - if i type "game"
>> - it shows me 2 games : "Aisleriot Solitaire " and "Freecell Solitaire"
>>
>> Actually there are 2 more games installed : Mahjongg and Minesweeper.
>> Not impressed at all about these search results. Hopefully this is
>> just a bug in the 12.04 beta .
>>
>>
>> >> The feature needs to exist before discussing whether it should be the
>> >> default or not .
>> >>
>> >> But anyway I am not asking any changes of the defaults.
>> >>
>> > It isn't obvious what "the feature" means. This is the Unity Design
>> > list,
>> > though. It's perfectly possible to make all kinds of different
>> > third-party
>> > programs, but that doesn't really belong on this list, I think.
>>
>> "the feature" = navigate applications in a directory-style in an
>> easy, comfortable way .
>>
>> By easy I mean : no unnecessary clicks, and possibility to go from
>> one category to another with at most 1 click (preferably 0 clicks :
>> mouse hover) .
>>
>> It can be a classic apps menu , or can be an improved Dash , or
>> can be some new fancy-looking categories browser that allows easy
>> navigation .
>>
>>
>> This discussion belongs here, because in principle a designer might
>> be curious to hear about specific aspects that makes some user(s)
>> unhappy .
>>
>>
>> >> Especially now after trying the
>> >> https://launchpad.net/classicmenu-indicator . It provides me what I
>> >> was missing , and it's not even necessary to use the gnome panel.
>> >> Hopefully this package will be available in the real repositories
>> >> someday (now it's in ppa).
>> >
>> > I personally think that's not the right place for it, since it doesn't
>> > indicate anything.
>>
>> It indicates that I no longer intend to spend too much energy with
>> discussing on this topic .
>>
>> >From my point of view the issue is solved : now I am aware about
>> several possibilities that will allow me to happily use Unity without
>> cursing every 5 minutes .
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adrian M
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design
>> Post to : unity-design@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
Adrian M
Follow ups
References
-
Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Omar B ., 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Omar B ., 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Michael Hall, 2012-02-24
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Ian Santopietro, 2012-02-25