unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #08221
Re: Category-based app browsing, was Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
>
> On 26. feb. 2012 11:35, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> > On 02/25/2012 10:03 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> >>
> >>> Each added step reduces the likelihood that a user becomes aware and
> >>> sure of the functionality and completes the task. Setting a "Filter"
> >>> does not fit well into a browsing approach.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Can you explain what? Is it the name "filter" you react to, or selecting
> >> categories? Because you do that in Gnome menubar as well, when you
> >> select Applications > Internet for instance.
> >
> > Yes, there's similarity in that you select Categories, be it as filter
> > or menu. You already mentioned one of the differences, but let me try
> > to make a complete list.
> >
>
> > What is different with using Filters in the Dash from using a menu
> > with sub-menus per category?
> > - Initially, there is no category selected
> > - Initially, categories are invisible
> > - Category selection is not exclusive, but additive (though not in 11.10)
> > - Category selection happens in a dedicated area, there is no
> > similarity in the representation of categories and items
>
> So I proposed showing the categories by default, and remembering the
> state until the user changed the view. That has nothing to do with any
> concepts. It's just an extremely small aspect. Categories are set to
> multi-select on left-click, which I consider to be a bug since no other
> software in Ubuntu works that way. Again, not a conceptual thing at all.
> Why is it important that the categories share screen space with the
> items? That isn't easy to understand. I would think you'd like to have a
> visual reminder of what category you're displaying.
here is the bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/841847
It was that there was no multi-select in 11.10, however, it did not specify that it needed to be just on click and not a combination. So i agree with others that Ctrl or shift + click would be more consistent.
>
> >
> >
> >> If you don't know what you're looking for, then you should use the
> >> Ubuntu
> >> Software Center.
> >
> > For finding and starting an application, the Software Center is not
> > well suited. It's startup time makes it seem ridiculous, when compared
> > to the application menu we had.
> >
>
> Remember the premiss that you have absolutely no idea what applications
> exist. You're browsing for available software now. You're not trying to
> launch something specific. If you were searching for something specific,
> you would obviously know what it was. The question is whether you would
> like page of information about the application, or if you'd like a five
> word summary. I don't think Windows 95-style menus are a good
> replacement for software centers as a way to browse available software.
>
>
> --
> Jo-Erlend Schinstad
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design
> Post to : unity-design@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
References
-
Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Omar B ., 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Omar B ., 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Michael Hall, 2012-02-24
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Ian Santopietro, 2012-02-25
-
Category-based app browsing, was Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Thorsten Wilms, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Category-based app browsing, was Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Category-based app browsing, was Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Thorsten Wilms, 2012-02-26
-
Re: Category-based app browsing, was Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2012-02-26