kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #11113
Re: boost_root driven by https
On 1 September 2013 14:27, Dick Hollenbeck <dick@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Executable
> >
> > Read about "relocations".
>
>
> Brian,
>
>
> I think your idea of looking at the PE headers is good.
>
>
> Also, maybe you can mimic the BASE ADDRESSES of the DLLs being built, and
> try and get
> mingw's LD, invoked under g++, to use the same ones:
>
>
>
> Something like this for each DLL:
>
>
> set( YOUR_DLL_BASE 0x2321000000 ) # adjust accordingly
>
> set_target_properties( your_dll PROPERTIES
> LINK_FLAGS -Wl,--image-base,${YOUR_DLL_BASE}
> )
>
>
> With the same base addresses, if there is still a big difference, then it
> is something else.
>
>
Okay, no problem. I can look at this to see what effect it has. Ultimately
the real slowness appears to be startup-time and not much else. The
performance of the applications (although obviously I'm only testing with
wxWidgets samples) appears to be comparable.
Thanks for the information, I wasn't aware of this gcc feature.
Best Regards,
Brian.
Follow ups
References
-
boost_root driven by https
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2013-08-20
-
Re: boost_root driven by https
From: Brian Sidebotham, 2013-08-23
-
Re: boost_root driven by https
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2013-08-23
-
Re: boost_root driven by https
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2013-08-23
-
Re: boost_root driven by https
From: Brian Sidebotham, 2013-08-24
-
Re: boost_root driven by https
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2013-08-31
-
Re: boost_root driven by https
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2013-08-31
-
Re: boost_root driven by https
From: Brian Sidebotham, 2013-08-31
-
Re: boost_root driven by https
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2013-09-01
-
Re: boost_root driven by https
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2013-09-01
-
Re: boost_root driven by https
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2013-09-01