openerp-community team mailing list archive
-
openerp-community team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03672
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
On 28/10/2013 12:12, Fabien Pinckaers wrote:
>>> to put this discussion in perspective, let me give an overview of
>>> which schema changes have been put through in ocb-addons/7.0 so far:
>>>
>>> - An 'active' field was added to account.journal
>>> - A sequence field was added to account.tax
>>> - A link was created from crm.phonecall.report to crm.lead
>> Just to understand the current policy: Are these changes already
>> included in trunk?
> No.
>
> And they will probably not be merged. (for sure, not in v7 - and
> probably not in trunk too)
>
> I may be wrong as I checked very quickly, but:
> - active field on account.journal: IMHO it's a serious bug introduced
> in ocb branch; if you desactivate a journal containing journal items
> you create inconsistencies in all your legal reports. --> We will
> not merge this as it's against the rule defined for financial
> integrity. (the user should never be able to create inconsistencies)
This I believe stems from
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-addons/+bug/1180803 which gives a
bit more context on the topic.
It would be nice to have such discussions occurring on the bug report if
only for traceability.
--
Alexandre Fayolle
Chef de Projet
Tel : + 33 (0)4 79 26 57 94
Camptocamp France SAS
Savoie Technolac, BP 352
73377 Le Bourget du Lac Cedex
http://www.camptocamp.com
References
-
Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Nhomar Hernández, 2013-10-22
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Quentin THEURET, 2013-10-23
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Ronald Portier, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Olivier Dony, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Olivier Dony, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Ronald Portier, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Raphael Valyi, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-26
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe informatique Numérigraphe, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-28