openerp-community team mailing list archive
-
openerp-community team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03708
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
On 10/28/2013 01:55 PM, Nicolas Bessi wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> - active field on account.journal: IMHO it's a serious bug introduced
>> in ocb branch; if you desactivate a journal containing journal items
>> you create inconsistencies in all your legal reports. --> We will
>> not merge this as it's against the rule defined for financial
>> integrity. (the user should never be able to create inconsistencies)
>
> I Can not agreed with this one as deactivate is already available on account.account model:
> 'active': fields.boolean('Active', select=2, help="If the active field is set to False, it will allow you to hide the account without removing it."),
Nicolas,
It's very different. On account.account we have a mechanism to avoid
inconsistencies by preventing to desactivate an account that contains
journal items. (check the write() method on account.account)
--
Fabien
References
-
Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Nhomar Hernández, 2013-10-22
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Quentin THEURET, 2013-10-23
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Ronald Portier, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Olivier Dony, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Olivier Dony, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Ronald Portier, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Raphael Valyi, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-26
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe informatique Numérigraphe, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Nicolas Bessi, 2013-10-28