yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02904
Re: velgrad
> Mmmmh... It is restricting possible loading scenarii, since F is not
> symmetric (imagine somebody wants to assign all 9 components of F).
I was talking about 6 stress components. Oce can always express
deformation with 6 components in "isotropic" (approximately) material
since rotation (remaining 3 components) doesn't change bulk properties.
If someone really needs that then, he will be smart to write such thing
himself/herself, I think.
(Political thing again, ratinally it has both pros (flexibility) and
cons (work), which have to be weighted based on assumed usage of the
most flexible scenario; to me it seems zero)
> They are two different ways to apply the goal stress. I thought
> stiffness was broken (is it or not?), that is why I used the inertial
> way.
>
I think it is overestimated about by factor of 2, leading me to think it
is almost right except something small like counting interactions twice
or such; I haven't checked the code since then carefully.
v
Follow ups
References
-
velgrad
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2009-12-25
-
Re: velgrad
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2009-12-25
-
Re: velgrad
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2009-12-26
-
Re: velgrad
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2009-12-26
-
Re: velgrad
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2009-12-27
-
Re: velgrad
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2009-12-27
-
Re: velgrad
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2009-12-27
-
Re: velgrad
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2009-12-27
-
Re: velgrad
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2009-12-27
-
Re: velgrad
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2009-12-29
-
Re: velgrad
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2009-12-30
-
Re: velgrad
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2009-12-30
-
Re: velgrad
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2009-12-30
-
Re: velgrad
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2009-12-30
-
Re: velgrad
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2009-12-30
-
Re: velgrad
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2009-12-30
-
Re: velgrad
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2009-12-30
-
Re: velgrad
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2009-12-30
-
Re: velgrad
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2009-12-30
-
Re: velgrad
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2009-12-31
-
Re: velgrad
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2010-01-01
-
Re: velgrad
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2010-01-01