openerp-community team mailing list archive
-
openerp-community team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03626
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
2013/10/25 Ovnicraft <ovnicraft@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Nhomar Hernández <nhomar@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>>
>> 2013/10/25 Pedro Manuel Baeza Romero <pedro.baeza@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>> I know too about runbot availability to run locally downloading source
>>> code, but the added value of runbot is to have it on-line, as Travis CI
>>> does. Anyway, I also see more interesting Launchpad / GitHub debate.
>>> @Fabien, have you talked about the switch internally?
>>
>>
>> I think It is a different discussion.
>>
>> 1.- Travis doesn't have "Auto Build ready to test" feature, and is
>> written in Ruby and double licence problem.
>>
>
> I consider you must check it again, Ruby is not a problem license.
>
The problem is not ruby sorry for the misunderstood is travis.
>
>> 2.- Launchpad is totally open and runbot.
>>
>
> You can check what is must used and all content around github.
>
Well, What is most used where, because 100% of package management is around
launchpad in Ubuntu.
It means, Launchpad and Github in our enviroment are == of powerful.
>
>> 3.- Runing runbot "Teach You" more deeply openerp, Running Travis "teach
>> you ...." well Travis.
>>
>
> Tech you testing.
>
May be, but I can answer to this.
We have unit test embebed in OpenERP already, is it helping with it?
We have 3 years with Yaml, is it helping with it?
BTW, If unit testing [1] with python don't help to teach you test, I don't
know what can. ;-)
>
>> 4.- The translation management is not possible/comparable in github like
>> in Launchpad.
>>
>
> Totally agree, P Christeas did a comparison with transifex and has the
> same results but translations can solved.
>
>>
>> 5.- The transition is not only "Move the branches" we need to move
>> internal process, internal developments that automate bzr projects and so
>> on.
>>
>
> Yes learn in deep git and workflow.
>
>>
>> IMHO: This change should be approved / done at least 6 moths __before__
>> move something, but even, compare bzr and git is a matter of religion
>> because both have the "same" posibilities i we read "Both" manuals.
>>
>
> Totally agree too here, transitions must be an agreement with all, but we
> must accept it github wins :-).
>
Jejejeje yes and God's son is White and Blue Eyes ;-) "It is a fact" my mom
told me that and everybody say it<ReligionJoke/>. ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
>>
>> BTW, it is only my opinion, the Positive impact is so little compared
>> with the cost it can bring.
>>
>> My 2 Cents.
>>
>>
>> --
>> --------------------
>> Saludos Cordiales
>>
>> Nhomar G. Hernandez M.
>> +58-414-4110269
>> Skype: nhomar00
>> Web-Blog: http://geronimo.com.ve
>> Servicios IT: http://vauxoo.com
>> Linux-Counter: 467724
>> Correos:
>> nhomar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> nhomar@xxxxxxxxxx
>> twitter @nhomar
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
>> Post to : openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cristian Salamea
> @ovnicraft
>
--
--------------------
Saludos Cordiales
Nhomar G. Hernandez M.
+58-414-4110269
Skype: nhomar00
Web-Blog: http://geronimo.com.ve
Servicios IT: http://vauxoo.com
Linux-Counter: 467724
Correos:
nhomar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
nhomar@xxxxxxxxxx
twitter @nhomar
References
-
Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Nhomar Hernández, 2013-10-22
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Quentin THEURET, 2013-10-23
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan Rijnhart, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Raphael Valyi, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Pedro Manuel Baeza Romero, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Денис Каратаев, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Pedro Manuel Baeza Romero, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Nhomar Hernández, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Ovnicraft, 2013-10-25