ubuntu-manual team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-manual team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04247
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
On 06/13/2013 09:50 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On 12 June 2013 12:32, Jonathan Marsden <jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Correct. Well, 12.04 users could try backporting the 13.04 texlive
>> source packages instead. It could work, but seems more effort than it
>> is worth at this point :)
> Already done: https://launchpad.net/~texlive-backports/+archive/ppa
>
> It shouldn't need much maintenance at this point but if somebody with
> PPA experience wants to take over maintainership, let me know.
Oh, nice :) Have you started down the path to getting them into the
precise-backports repository, following the info at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports
?
Hmmm, this means I could enhance my setup script to add that PPA and
grab the backported packages, if it is run on 12.04... I might give that
a go...
Jonathan
Follow ups
References
-
Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Patrick Dickey, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Tony Pursell, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Kevin Godby, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Tony Pursell, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Kevin Godby, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Kevin Godby, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Patrick Dickey, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Patrick Dickey, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Yorvyk, 2013-06-12
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-12
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jeremy Bicha, 2013-06-13