ubuntu-manual team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-manual team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04248
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
On 14 June 2013 00:24, Jonathan Marsden <jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Oh, nice :) Have you started down the path to getting them into the
> precise-backports repository, following the info at
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports
That's not possible. First, backported packages still can't depend on
other backported packages (there's an old bug requesting that).
Then you'd have to test all the reverse dependencies (packages that
build against texlive) to make sure they still work and there are a
very large number of those.
Jeremy
References
-
Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Patrick Dickey, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Tony Pursell, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Kevin Godby, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Tony Pursell, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Kevin Godby, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Kevin Godby, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Patrick Dickey, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Patrick Dickey, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Yorvyk, 2013-06-12
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-12
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jeremy Bicha, 2013-06-13
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-14