ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02606
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
>
> If attaching an email, and it opens the email app to do so, it would
> surely be done in a way that when you select the email it automatically
> closes and returns to the calendar.
> In other words, it acts like a dialog pop-up or something, not a
> separate app. So, you would have a 'select' and 'cancel' button, both of
> which would take you back to the calendar. You would not use a back
> button, as that is indeed confusing.
You might wanna get that into the design guidelines. Or at least outline
some "Back button guidelines"
there is no such thing as the
> latter (as I understand it).
Someone said the right-edge swipe works that way.
Zisu Andrei
On 25 June 2013 15:19, Sam Bull <sam.hacking@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 15:05 +0100, Zisu Andrei wrote:
> > Inbox. The back button is in an app, why would the back button
> > exit the
> > app? Nothing should take you 'back to the notifications'
> > Well, see, that's where the confusion comes, I see the page stack as
> > having the email page on top of the notifications page, thus if it
> > were to go back in the stack, I would go back to notifications.
>
> What notifications page? There is no such thing. The notifications are
> in the indicators at the top, there is no 'page'.
>
> > as the
> > notifications are in the indicators along the top, just drag
> > it down if
> > you want to access them again.
> > What if I was in the calendar app and attached an email to my calendar
> > entry. I go to the email, want to go back to calendar?
>
> If attaching an email, and it opens the email app to do so, it would
> surely be done in a way that when you select the email it automatically
> closes and returns to the calendar.
>
> In other words, it acts like a dialog pop-up or something, not a
> separate app. So, you would have a 'select' and 'cancel' button, both of
> which would take you back to the calendar. You would not use a back
> button, as that is indeed confusing.
>
> > There needs to be a clear distinction between in-app back and os-level
> > back
>
> There is. The back button works in-app, there is no such thing as the
> latter (as I understand it).
>
>
Follow ups
References
-
[Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Lou Greenwood, 2013-06-12
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Clément Gimenez, 2013-06-12
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Sid Payton, 2013-06-12
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Simon, 2013-06-12
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Josh Leverette, 2013-06-12
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Josh Leverette, 2013-06-12
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Scott May, 2013-06-12
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Matthew Paul Thomas, 2013-06-13
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Tony Espy, 2013-06-18
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Scott May, 2013-06-18
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Michel Renon, 2013-06-24
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Michael Spencer, 2013-06-24
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Zisu Andrei, 2013-06-24
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Michael Spencer, 2013-06-24
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Josh Leverette, 2013-06-25
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Michael Spencer, 2013-06-25
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Zisu Andrei, 2013-06-25
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Sam Bull, 2013-06-25
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Zisu Andrei, 2013-06-25
-
Re: [Design] Page stack back gesture
From: Sam Bull, 2013-06-25