openerp-community team mailing list archive
-
openerp-community team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03666
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
> OK, thanks. We'll have to see if these builds suffer from the same
> problem of not being able to update as well.
Don't forget that, even if it works, the advantage of runbot is to test
branches BEFORE they are merged in the ocb branch.
And this is the main reason why you need to register a team, and not a
branch. This allows to control feature-branches are green before merging
them.
Today, tests are performed after merge have been done, which is not a
good approach because one may download buggy branches.
I am happy to see that things are improving,
Thanks everyone for this.
--
Fabien Pinckaers
CEO OpenERP
Chaussée de Namur 40
B-1367 Grand-Rosière
Belgium
Phone: +32.81.81.37.00
Fax: +32.81.73.35.01
Web: http://openerp.com
Follow ups
References
-
Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Nhomar Hernández, 2013-10-22
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Quentin THEURET, 2013-10-23
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Ronald Portier, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Olivier Dony, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe informatique Numérigraphe, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Mario Arias, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Olivier Dony, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Ferdinand, 2013-10-26
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Ferdinand, 2013-10-26
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-27
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan Rijnhart, 2013-10-27
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-27
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Ana Juaristi, 2013-10-27
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Moises Lopez, 2013-10-27
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Moises Lopez, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-28