p2psp team mailing list archive
-
p2psp team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00211
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
Hi everybody!
Just a little remark to this long but insightful message (thanks Juan
Alvaro).
First, yes, using DS should be the definitive solution, but, regarding this:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:04 PM Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo <
juanalvaro83@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
all peers behind the same public IP (NAT scenario) will be banned if one
> of them is malicious
>
It the EMS set of rules is implemented, more than one peer can be in the
same private network and all are different for the splitter.
Cheers,
Vi.
--
--
Vicente González Ruiz
Depto de Informática
Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería
Universidad de Almería
Carretera Sacramento S/N
04120, La Cañada de San Urbano
Almería, España
e-mail: vruiz@xxxxxx
http://www.ual.es/~vruiz
tel: +34 950 015711
fax: +34 950 015486
Follow ups
References
-
CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-05-23
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Cristóbal Medina López, 2015-05-23
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-05-24
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-05-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-05-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-05-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-05-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-05-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-05-31
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-06-01
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-01
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-08
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-06-09
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-06-14