unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #08211
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:32, Matt Richardson
<m.richardson.1990@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Whilst it's great that finding applications can now be done by tags, I was
> actually referring to replacing the whole folder/fie system with tags.
You can already have that : just save every file in a single
directory and prefix each file name with "music_ " or "job_ " or
"porn_" or whatever tag you like.
If you search for "job" you'll get the list of file tagged with "job" !
So there is no need to reinvent how do the operating systems handle
the files and directories .
> i.e. When I save something, I no longer select the folder to save it into, I
> simply choose from a list of pre-existinsg tags (defaults and ones I have
> previously created) or type in a box to add a new tag.
Sounds like a nightmare to have a filesystem that works that way.
Fortunately it's extremely unlikely to see it happening .
The hierachical directories is concept too deeply used in all
operating systems . It will not go away just because many users use
their computers only for web and searching photos/videos/music .
> The single biggest advantage to me of this system is that I can place a
> single document in multiple locations.
> One problem which would need to be overcome would be unique naming (since
> files are no longer separated by folders)
Exactly : the file names would become unique within the partition .
This would break the source code tree of tons of applications : the
sources are typically organized as a directory tree where each
subdirectory has its own Makefile .
No software developer could ever work with an experimental
tags-based filesystem .
> On the other hand, I haven't before explored how easy it is to create
> hardlinks. I just did. The answer is very easy (Middle click drag and drop)
> Since this solves the multiple location issue, but without dragging up its
> own set of problems, perhaps I should just use this.
It might be able to build a filemanager designed around the idea of
file labels , with the ability to make it super-easy to create
symlinks/hardlinks .
But this can only be an alternative presentation : underneath there
has to be a normal filesystem.
--
Adrian
Follow ups
References
-
Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Omar B ., 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Omar B ., 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-22
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Michael Hall, 2012-02-24
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Ian Santopietro, 2012-02-25
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Adrian Maier, 2012-02-26
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2012-02-26
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Matt Richardson, 2012-02-26
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Treviño, 2012-02-26
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Jeremy Bicha, 2012-02-26
-
Re: Some impressions about the current status of Unity
From: Matt Richardson, 2012-02-26