p2psp team mailing list archive

[Vicente Gonzalez <vicente.gonzalez.ruiz@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Ilshat,

are you using the commands I can see in your blog?

Regards,
Vi.

On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:59 PM Ilshat Shakirov <im.shakirov@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Hi all!
>
> Here is new blogpost:
> http://shakirov-dev.blogspot.ru/2015/06/the-third-week.html
>
> Also, I want you to test my code please. There is strange errors
> sometimes. After monitor is connected, it doesnt receive new chunks from
> splitter. And after the trusted peer is connected to team, monitor exclude
> it from team for 129 losses. It occurs sometimes, and I can't understand
> why it's happening.
>
> Thanks!
>
> 2015-06-20 5:05 GMT+05:00 Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo <
> juanalvaro83@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> FYI:
>>
>> https://torrentfreak.com/popular-torrents-being-sabotaged-by-ipv6-peer-flood-150619/
>>
>>
>> Le 18 juin 2015 19:41:12 CEST, Ilshat Shakirov <im.shakirov@xxxxxxxxx> a
>> écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> Sorry for the delay in the response.
>>>
>>> -On replacing CRC32 for SHA-256. ...
>>>>
>>> Ok, thanks for the explanation.
>>>
>>> Overriding sendto() function ...
>>>>
>>> Thanks =)
>>>
>>> -Packet verification frequency (the 255 problem).
>>>>
>>> Ok, I will do it as you described.
>>>
>>> -Malicious peers sending packets even after expelled. ...
>>>>
>>> I will return to this task after implementing the first steps in
>>> STrPe-DS.
>>>
>>> Regarding testing crypto-libs:
>>> I have performed that tests, here is results:
>>>
>>>> MacBookPro-Ilya-Shakirov:crypto-test i.shakirov$ ./test-ecdsa.py
>>>> key.sign x100 times: 2.76373291016s
>>>> key.verify x100 times: 5.61430811882s
>>>> MacBookPro-Ilya-Shakirov:crypto-test i.shakirov$ ./test-pycrypto.py
>>>> key.sign x100 times: 0.0404751300812s
>>>> key.verify x100 times: 0.038027048111s
>>>>
>>> My laptop config is i7 2.9GHz; 8Gb RAM;
>>> Source of this synth-tests can be found here:
>>> https://github.com/ishakirov/p2psp/commit/d833589ffc5a9a923123c56a74bc0bba2a79c97a
>>>
>>> I think that pycrypto lib is suitable for our needs in speed. So Im
>>> planning to use it in STrPe-DS implementation.
>>>
>>> PS. Sorry for 3rd week blogpost, but I think there is too small results
>>> to write blogpost. But 4th week blogspot will be. =)
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-06-15 11:19 GMT+05:00 Vicente Gonzalez <
>>> vicente.gonzalez.ruiz@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>>> Hi everybody!
>>>>
>>>> Just a little remark to this long but insightful message (thanks Juan
>>>> Alvaro).
>>>>
>>>> First, yes, using DS should be the definitive solution, but, regarding
>>>> this:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:04 PM Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo <
>>>> juanalvaro83@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  all peers behind the same public IP (NAT scenario) will be banned if
>>>>> one of them is malicious
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It the EMS set of rules is implemented, more than one peer can be in
>>>> the same private network and all are different for the splitter.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Vi.
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> Vicente González Ruiz
>>>> Depto de Informática
>>>> Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería
>>>> Universidad de Almería
>>>>
>>>> Carretera Sacramento S/N
>>>> 04120, La Cañada de San Urbano
>>>> Almería, España
>>>>
>>>> e-mail: vruiz@xxxxxx
>>>> http://www.ual.es/~vruiz
>>>> tel: +34 950 015711
>>>> fax: +34 950 015486
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~p2psp
>>>> Post to     : p2psp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~p2psp
>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Enviado desde mi teléfono con K-9 Mail.
>>
>
> --
-- 
Vicente González Ruiz
Depto de Informática
Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería
Universidad de Almería

Carretera Sacramento S/N
04120, La Cañada de San Urbano
Almería, España

e-mail: vruiz@xxxxxx
http://www.ual.es/~vruiz
tel: +34 950 015711
fax: +34 950 015486