openerp-community team mailing list archive
-
openerp-community team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03692
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
Oliver,
El oct 28, 2013 12:11 PM, "Olivier Dony" <odo@xxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Moises Lopez <moylop260@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>>
>> Hello Oliver,
>>
>> Current openerp-runbot there is hard-code for sticky branches.
>
> Actually, this can be configured dynamically too. But first the team
config must be clean.
Yes, sorry you are right.
I make changes for add many addons branches and check MP (my particular
needs for l10n_mx sticky).
For ocb with original runbot should be done.
>
>>
>> I modified this file for explain this point:
>>
>>
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AotaKTc4rOjsdGYyaU5IbHVJbHFkY0thNEVqa2hwckE&usp=sharing
>> Can you see row 9 of this spreadsheet?
>
> Yes I saw the spreadsheet and I had a quick look at your patches to
runbot too, but I don't think we'll want to merge that. We would prefer if
not everyone is allowed to setup sticky branches, as people are very good
at misusing the tools you give them, and the cases where a sticky branch is
needed should be fairly limited.
You're right.
Should be fairly limited, but IMHO no hard code then no openerp-runbot
restart.
Now, the question is:
Will you add ocb branches to sticky (from hard-code)? (later of cleanup)
Have you planned add localization projects in RunBot like sticky?
FYI our runbot was modify for this.
Our small server is available to the community, too.
>
References
-
Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Nhomar Hernández, 2013-10-22
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Quentin THEURET, 2013-10-23
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Ronald Portier, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Olivier Dony, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe informatique Numérigraphe, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Mario Arias, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Olivier Dony, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Ferdinand, 2013-10-26
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Ferdinand, 2013-10-26
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-27
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan Rijnhart, 2013-10-27
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-27
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Ana Juaristi, 2013-10-27
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Moises Lopez, 2013-10-27
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Moises Lopez, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Moises Lopez, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Olivier Dony, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Moises Lopez, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Olivier Dony, 2013-10-28