p2psp team mailing list archive

["L.G.Casado" <leo@xxxxxx>]

Hi all,
El mié, 24-06-2015 a las 16:44 +0500, Ilshat Shakirov escribió:
> Hello!,
> 
> 
>         as far as I understood, Monitor and Trusted peers  are the
>         different names for the same type of peer.
>         
>  
> No, this is 2 different peers in the team. Is it right?

Actually, a monitor in STrPe check that everything is correct and to
reduce repeated work it can acts a trusted peer.

>         We need to perform more realistic scenarios. For instance a
>         group of people sharing a video. 
>         
>  
> Ok.
> 
> 
>         Let fix the number of  well intended peers to 20.
>         1.1 and 1.2 seems to be solved.
>         1.3 also.
>         What about 1.2-1.3 together. As malicious peer, once
>         discovered I guess who is the Trusted peer I will sent good
>         chunks in new off-on connection.
>         So I can perform a selective attack.
>         Does malicious 1-2-1.3 peer persists? Give an advice of how to
>         solve this type of attack (The code for the solution for your
>         advice is not part of GSoC)
>         1.4 (Has no sense in STrPe) because Spliter only hear from
>         Trusted peer.
>         1.5. DoS was not selected as one of the attacks in GSoC
>         1.6. Collaborative Attack: One of the malicious peers can
>         inform the others about a possible Trusted peer.
>         
>  
> Ok, I will edit the document to suit this conditions.
> 
> 
>         So, Just use a set of 20 well intended peers and add a
>         different number of malicious peers (1 to 40)  and  different
>         type of (basic) attacks in order to know how many malicious
>         peers and of what type of attacks the fix (20 well intended
>         peers and one Trusted  peer) system can support.
>         System performance can be measured, for instance, in how many
>         good chunks have a good peer received out of all. 
>         
> 
> 
> Ok; Is there any option run peer without running a player? I'm going
> to run all peers in one local machine, is it right?

You can reduce the set to 10 if needed.

Best,

Leo