dolfin team mailing list archive

1. dolfin team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the dolfin mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• Re: Red buildbot, (continued)
  • Re: Red buildbot
    From: Johan Hake, 2013-03-12
  • Re: Red buildbot
    From: Anders Logg, 2013-03-12
  • Re: Red buildbot
    From: Anders Logg, 2013-03-12
  • Re: Red buildbot
    From: Johan Hake, 2013-03-12
  • Re: Red buildbot
    From: Nico Schlömer, 2013-03-12
  • Re: Red buildbot
    From: Anders Logg, 2013-03-12
  • Re: Red buildbot
    From: Anders Logg, 2013-03-12
  • Re: Red buildbot
    From: Marie E. Rognes, 2013-03-12
  • Re: Red buildbot
    From: Anders Logg, 2013-03-12
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Marie E. Rognes, 2011-05-30
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-30
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-30
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-30
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-30
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Marie E. Rognes, 2011-05-30
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-30
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-30
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-30
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-30
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-30
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-30
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Marie E. Rognes, 2011-05-31
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-31
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Marie E. Rognes, 2011-05-31
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-31
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-30
• Re: [Bug 734527] Re: New style sub-domains do not carry across form transformation
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-30
• DOLFIN 0.9.12
  From: Marie E. Rognes, 2011-05-29
• Re: DOLFIN 0.9.12
  From: Kent-Andre Mardal, 2011-05-30
• Re: DOLFIN 0.9.12
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-30
• Re: DOLFIN 0.9.12
  From: Garth N. Wells, 2011-05-30
• Re: [Question #157385]: parametric equation
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2011-05-29
• Re: [Question #157279]: contact mechanics simulation in Fenics
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2011-05-28
• Re: [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/rognes] Rev 5892: Clean-up targets for doc generation:
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/rognes] Rev 5892: Clean-up targets for doc generation:
  From: Marie E. Rognes, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/rognes] Rev 5892: Clean-up targets for doc generation:
  From: Kristian Ølgaard, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/rognes] Rev 5892: Clean-up targets for doc generation:
  From: Marie E. Rognes, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/rognes] Rev 5892: Clean-up targets for doc generation:
  From: Kristian Ølgaard, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/rognes] Rev 5892: Clean-up targets for doc generation:
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/rognes] Rev 5892: Clean-up targets for doc generation:
  From: Marie E. Rognes, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/rognes] Rev 5892: Clean-up targets for doc generation:
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/rognes] Rev 5892: Clean-up targets for doc generation:
  From: Kristian Ølgaard, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/rognes] Rev 5892: Clean-up targets for doc generation:
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/rognes] Rev 5892: Clean-up targets for doc generation:
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/rognes] Rev 5892: Clean-up targets for doc generation:
  From: Kristian Ølgaard, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Question #159192]: steady state solution to Fokker-Planck Eqn.
  From: Graham Rowlands, 2011-05-26
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #159192]: steady state solution to Fokker-Planck Eqn.
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Question #159192]: steady state solution to Fokker-Planck Eqn.
  From: N.A. Borggren, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Question #159192]: steady state solution to Fokker-Planck Eqn.
  From: N.A. Borggren, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Question #159192]: steady state solution to Fokker-Planck Eqn.
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-27
• Re: [Question #159192]: steady state solution to Fokker-Planck Eqn.
  From: Graham Rowlands, 2011-05-27
• [Question #159192]: steady state solution to Fokker-Planck Eqn.
  From: Graham Rowlands, 2011-05-26
• Re: [Question #159115]: parameters form compiler quadrature degree
  From: Garth Wells, 2011-05-26
• [Question #159115]: parameters form compiler quadrature degree
  From: Ida Norderhaug Drøsdal, 2011-05-26
• jit signature
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-26
• Re: jit signature
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-26
• Re: jit signature
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-26
• Re: jit signature
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-26
• Re: jit signature
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-26
• Re: jit signature
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-26
• Re: jit signature
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-26
• Re: jit signature
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-26
• Re: [Question #159021]: Assigning initial values to a mixed function space for a nonlinear problem.
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-25
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #159021]: Assigning initial values to a mixed function space for a nonlinear problem.
  From: Garth Wells, 2011-05-26
• Re: [Question #159021]: Assigning initial values to a mixed function space for a nonlinear problem.
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-26
• Re: [Question #159021]: Assigning initial values to a mixed function space for a nonlinear problem.
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-26
• [Question #159021]: Assigning initial values to a mixed function space for a nonlinear problem.
  From: Douglas Brinkerhoff, 2011-05-25
• Re: [Question #159021]: Assigning initial values to a mixed function space for a nonlinear problem.
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-25
• Re: [Question #159021]: Assigning initial values to a mixed function space for a nonlinear problem.
  From: Douglas Brinkerhoff, 2011-05-25
• Re: [Question #159021]: Assigning initial values to a mixed function space for a nonlinear problem.
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-26
• Re: [Question #159021]: Assigning initial values to a mixed function space for a nonlinear problem.
  From: Douglas Brinkerhoff, 2011-05-26
• Re: [Question #159021]: Assigning initial values to a mixed function space for a nonlinear problem.
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-26
• Regression in dolfin_utils
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-25
• Re: Regression in dolfin_utils
  From: Marie E. Rognes, 2011-05-25
• Re: Regression in dolfin_utils
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-26
• Re: Regression in dolfin_utils
  From: Marie E. Rognes, 2011-05-26
• [noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/wells] Rev 5887: Remove totally confusing double pointers from ale.]
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-24
• Re: [noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/wells] Rev 5887: Remove totally confusing double pointers from ale.]
  From: Garth N. Wells, 2011-05-24
• [Question #158815]: Running channel_with_flap.py from cbc.solve:sandbox/fsi
  From: Kyle, 2011-05-24
• Re: [Question #158688]: the inverse and elements of stiffness matrix on C++
  From: James Avery, 2011-05-24
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #158688]: the inverse and elements of stiffness matrix on C++
  From: Nguyen Van Dang, 2011-05-24
• Re: [Question #158688]: the inverse and elements of stiffness matrix on C++
  From: Nguyen Van Dang, 2011-05-24
• Re: [Question #158688]: the inverse and elements of stiffness matrix on C++
  From: Nguyen Van Dang, 2011-05-24
• Re: [Question #158693]: Finite Volume in FEniCS
  From: Neilen Marais, 2011-05-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #158693]: Finite Volume in FEniCS
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158693]: Finite Volume in FEniCS
  From: B. Emek Abali, 2011-05-25
• [Question #158693]: Finite Volume in FEniCS
  From: Luis M. de la Cruz, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158693]: Finite Volume in FEniCS
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158693]: Finite Volume in FEniCS
  From: David Ham, 2011-05-24
• [Question #158688]: the inverse and elements of stiffness matrix on C++
  From: Nguyen Van Dang, 2011-05-23
• [Question #158689]: Compiling and running with mpi
  From: Luis M. de la Cruz, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158387]: swig problems when remaming windows fenics install directory
  From: Chaffra, 2011-05-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #158387]: swig problems when remaming windows fenics install directory
  From: Johannes Ring, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158387]: swig problems when remaming windows fenics install directory
  From: Chaffra, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158387]: swig problems when remaming windows fenics install directory
  From: Chaffra, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158387]: swig problems when remaming windows fenics install directory
  From: Chaffra, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158387]: swig problems when remaming windows fenics install directory
  From: Johannes Ring, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158387]: swig problems when remaming windows fenics install directory
  From: Chaffra, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158387]: swig problems when remaming windows fenics install directory
  From: Chaffra, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158387]: swig problems when remaming windows fenics install directory
  From: Johannes Ring, 2011-05-23
• How can I see which quadrature scheme is chosen when calling assemble?
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-23
• Re: How can I see which quadrature scheme is chosen when calling assemble?
  From: Kristian Ølgaard, 2011-05-23
• Re: How can I see which quadrature scheme is chosen when calling assemble?
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-23
• Code verification script
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-23
• Re: Code verification script
  From: Marie E. Rognes, 2011-05-23
• Re: Code verification script
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #156292]: interface problem with permeability
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2011-05-22
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #156292]: interface problem with permeability
  From: Nguyen Van Dang, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158387]: swing problems when remaming windows fenics install directory
  From: Johannes Ring, 2011-05-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #158387]: swing problems when remaming windows fenics install directory
  From: Chaffra, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158387]: swing problems when remaming windows fenics install directory
  From: Chaffra, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158387]: swing problems when remaming windows fenics install directory
  From: Chaffra, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158387]: swing problems when remaming windows fenics install directory
  From: Chaffra, 2011-05-23
• [Question #158387]: swing problems when remaming windows fenics install directory
  From: Chaffra, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158354]: Upgraded to Ubuntu 11.04 Natty, broken package error
  From: Johannes Ring, 2011-05-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #158354]: Upgraded to Ubuntu 11.04 Natty, broken package error
  From: Kyle, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158354]: Upgraded to Ubuntu 11.04 Natty, broken package error
  From: Johannes Ring, 2011-05-21
• Re: [Question #158354]: Upgraded to Ubuntu 11.04 Natty, broken package error
  From: Kyle, 2011-05-21
• Re: [Question #158354]: Upgraded to Ubuntu 11.04 Natty, broken package error
  From: Johannes Ring, 2011-05-21
• Re: [Question #158354]: Upgraded to Ubuntu 11.04 Natty, broken package error
  From: Kyle, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158354]: Upgraded to Ubuntu 11.04 Natty, broken package error
  From: Johannes Ring, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158354]: Upgraded to Ubuntu 11.04 Natty, broken package error
  From: Kyle, 2011-05-23
• [Question #158354]: Upgraded to Ubuntu 11.04 Natty, broken package error
  From: Kyle, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158315]: Taking the "stiffness matrix" on C++
  From: Nguyen Van Dang, 2011-05-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #158315]: Taking the "stiffness matrix" on C++
  From: James Avery, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158315]: Taking the "stiffness matrix" on C++
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158315]: Taking the "stiffness matrix" on C++
  From: James Avery, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158315]: Taking the "stiffness matrix" on C++
  From: James Avery, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158315]: Taking the "stiffness matrix" on C++
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158315]: Taking the "stiffness matrix" on C++
  From: Nguyen Van Dang, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158315]: Taking the "stiffness matrix" on C++
  From: Nguyen Van Dang, 2011-05-23
• Re: [Question #158315]: Taking the "stiffness matrix" on C++
  From: James Avery, 2011-05-23
• [Question #158315]: integration of the dot product of gradient of two basis functions
  From: Nguyen Van Dang, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #155893]: Convergence Issues using Newton solver for Navier Stokes
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158285]: grad f evaluation with C++
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #158285]: grad f evaluation with C++
  From: Kristian B . Ølgaard, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158285]: grad f evaluation with C++
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-20
• [Question #158285]: grad f evaluation with C++
  From: James Avery, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158285]: grad f evaluation with C++
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158285]: grad f evaluation with C++
  From: James Avery, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158285]: grad f evaluation with C++
  From: Kristian Ølgaard, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158285]: grad f evaluation with C++
  From: James Avery, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158285]: grad f evaluation with C++
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158276]: Nodal positions and FE-function coefficients
  From: James Avery, 2011-05-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #158276]: Nodal positions and FE-function coefficients
  From: Kristian B . Ølgaard, 2011-05-20
• [Question #158276]: Nodal positions and FE-function coefficients
  From: James Avery, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158276]: Nodal positions and FE-function coefficients
  From: Kristian Ølgaard, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158276]: Nodal positions and FE-function coefficients
  From: James Avery, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158239]: compile dolfin on windows with CGAL
  From: Chaffra, 2011-05-19
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #158239]: compile dolfin on windows with CGAL
  From: Johannes Ring, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158239]: compile dolfin on windows with CGAL
  From: Johannes Ring, 2011-05-20
• Re: [Question #158239]: compile dolfin on windows with CGAL
  From: Chaffra, 2011-05-20
• [Question #158239]: compile dolfin on windows with CGAL
  From: Chaffra, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158115]: Second order normal derivative
  From: Garth Wells, 2011-05-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #158115]: Second order normal derivative
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158115]: Second order normal derivative
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-19
• [Question #158115]: Second order normal derivative
  From: Gerard Awanou, 2011-05-18
• Re: [Question #158115]: Second order normal derivative
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158115]: Second order normal derivative
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158115]: Second order normal derivative
  From: Gerard Awanou, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158115]: Second order normal derivative
  From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2011-05-19
• [Question #158032]: Status of bug #784774 changed to 'Fix Committed' in DOLFIN
  From: Garth Wells, 2011-05-18
• [Question #158032]: Status of bug #784774 changed to 'Confirmed' in DOLFIN
  From: Garth Wells, 2011-05-18
• Re: [Question #158097]: solver memory error
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-18
• [Question #158097]: solver memory error
  From: Siva Shankar Rudraraju, 2011-05-18
• Re: [Question #158097]: solver memory error
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-18
• Re: [Question #158032]: Saving tensor to file
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #158032]: Saving tensor to file
  From: Garth Wells, 2011-05-18
• Re: [Question #158032]: Saving tensor to file
  From: Bob Myhill, 2011-05-18
• Re: [Question #158012]: Extracting data from specific points
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #158012]: Extracting data from specific points
  From: Kristian B . Ølgaard, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158012]: Extracting data from specific points
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158012]: Extracting data from specific points
  From: Kyle, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158012]: Extracting data from specific points
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158012]: Extracting data from specific points
  From: Kyle, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158012]: Extracting data from specific points
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158012]: Extracting data from specific points
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158012]: Extracting data from specific points
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158012]: Extracting data from specific points
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158012]: Extracting data from specific points
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158012]: Extracting data from specific points
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158012]: Extracting data from specific points
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-19
• Re: [Question #158012]: Extracting data from specific points
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-19
• [Question #158032]: Saving tensor to file
  From: myhill.bob, 2011-05-18
• Re: [Question #158032]: Saving tensor to file
  From: Johan Hake, 2011-05-18
• Re: [Question #158032]: Saving tensor to file
  From: Bob Myhill, 2011-05-18
• Re: [Question #158032]: Saving tensor to file
  From: Garth N. Wells, 2011-05-18
• Re: [Question #158032]: Saving tensor to file
  From: Bob Myhill, 2011-05-18
• Setting exterior_facet_domains
  From: Harish Narayanan, 2011-05-18
• Re: Setting exterior_facet_domains
  From: Marie E. Rognes, 2011-05-18
• Re: Setting exterior_facet_domains
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-18
• Re: Setting exterior_facet_domains
  From: Harish Narayanan, 2011-05-18
• Re: Setting exterior_facet_domains
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-18
• Re: [Question #158020]: mute Dolfin's output
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-18
• [Question #158020]: mute Dolfin's output
  From: Bento, 2011-05-18
• Re: [Question #158020]: mute Dolfin's output
  From: Anders Logg, 2011-05-18
• Re: [Question #158020]: mute Dolfin's output
  From: Bento, 2011-05-18
• Re: [Question #157341]: flow on inner boundary
  From: Melanie Jahny, 2011-05-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #157341]: flow on inner boundary
  From: Melanie Jahny, 2011-05-27
• [Question #158012]: Extracting data from specific points
  From: Kyle, 2011-05-18

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2012 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  System status