p2psp team mailing list archive
-
p2psp team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00282
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
>
> If waiting time is how much to leave the system run, i think it will run
> until there is not malicious and w param is not needed.
Yes, it is. After initializing all the peers, system is working for w
seconds. I will try to remove this option, so the system will work only if
there are malicious peers in the team.
Thanks!
2015-08-04 17:10 GMT+05:00 L.G.Casado <leo@xxxxxx>:
> Dear Ilshat,
>
> Sorry, It is not still clear for me the w parameter.
> You run a script to initialte good peers, other for malicious, and
> trusted. Then, you wait w seconds, why?
> You mean, the Spliter does not send chuncks after that time?
> In such case, Rounds count should be the spliter one.
>
> If waiting time is how much to leave the system run, i think it will run
> until there is not malicious and w param is not needed.
>
> Thanks, it will be nice to have a math model for:
> i)buffer_correctness depending on good/malicious peers.
> ii)Number of rounds to expel malicious.
>
> Regarding:
> Ok, so there will be 3 graphs with trends of number of maliicous and
> buffer correctness values, and average for number of rounds to expel all
> malicious peers. Am I right?
> Yes, Run 5, remove the worst and best according to the number of rounds to
> expel malicious. The remaining 3 will be nice. It is also interesting, to
> know the position of the trusted peers.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best,
>
> Leo
>
References
-
CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-05-23
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Cristóbal Medina López, 2015-05-23
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-05-24
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-05-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-05-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-05-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-05-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-05-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-05-31
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-06-01
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-01
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-08
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-06-09
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-06-14
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Vicente Gonzalez, 2015-06-15
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-18
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-06-20
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-21
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Vicente Gonzalez, 2015-06-22
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-22
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Vicente Gonzalez, 2015-06-22
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-06-22
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-23
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-06-23
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-24
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-06-24
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Vicente Gonzalez, 2015-06-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-07-19
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Vicente Gonzalez, 2015-07-21
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-07-22
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-07-26
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-07-27
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-07-27
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-07-27
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-07-28
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-07-28
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-08-03
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-08-04
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-08-04
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-08-04