p2psp team mailing list archive
-
p2psp team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00283
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
One remarkable result here is the fact that having a second trusted peer
> does not have a real impact on malicious peer expulsion. I realize now that
> this is due to how the Str technique is designed. Not for GSoC, but maybe
> we should think of a evolution of the protocol that reflected the
> aggregation of trusted peers. Cristóbal, that might be intersting if it has
> not been researched yet.
>
But adding second trusted peer accelerates the expulsion of attackers, you
can see it in the last graphs (-m 50 -t 1 and -m 50 -t 2) : in the case of
one trusted there not all attackers were expelled from the team for given
time, and in the second case - all attackers were expelled by ~100 round.
Ok let me rephrase like this: the addition of a second trusted peer has
little impact. The speed at which expulsions are done is comparable, and
for the 1 trusted peer case the remaining malicious peers are 1 or 2 at
most. But you're right, having 2 peers eliminates all malicious peers in
all cases, which is already a remarkable result ;)
Can't wait to see what happens with 4 and 8!
Juan
Follow ups
References
-
CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-05-23
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Cristóbal Medina López, 2015-05-23
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-05-24
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-05-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-05-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-05-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-05-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-05-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-05-31
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-06-01
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-01
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-08
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-06-09
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-06-14
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Vicente Gonzalez, 2015-06-15
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-18
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-06-20
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-21
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Vicente Gonzalez, 2015-06-22
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-22
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Vicente Gonzalez, 2015-06-22
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-06-22
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-23
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-06-23
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-06-24
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-06-24
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Vicente Gonzalez, 2015-06-25
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-07-19
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Vicente Gonzalez, 2015-07-21
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-07-22
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-07-26
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-07-27
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-07-27
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo, 2015-07-27
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-07-28
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-07-28
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-08-03
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: L.G.Casado, 2015-08-04
-
Re: CIS of rules (GSoC)
From: Ilshat Shakirov, 2015-08-04