yade-users team mailing list archive

1. yade-users team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the yade-users mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• Re: [Question #683790]: RockBolt engine, (continued)
  • Re: [Question #683790]: RockBolt engine
    From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-25
• Re: [Question #684213]: microstrain field
  From: procrastinator, 2019-09-24
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684213]: microstrain field
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-25
• Re: [Question #684213]: microstrain field
  From: procrastinator, 2019-09-25
• Re: [Question #684213]: microstrain field
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-25
• Re: [Question #684213]: microstrain field
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2019-09-25
• Re: [Question #684213]: microstrain field
  From: procrastinator, 2019-09-25
• Re: [Question #684213]: microstrain field
  From: procrastinator, 2019-09-25
• Re: [Question #684213]: microstrain field
  From: procrastinator, 2019-09-25
• [Question #684213]: microstrain field
  From: procrastinator, 2019-09-24
• Re: [Question #684181]: Spheres are passing through in a new model when they interact
  From: chanaka Udaya, 2019-09-24
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684181]: Spheres are passing through in a new model when they interact
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2019-09-24
• [Question #684181]: Spheres are passing through in a new model when they interact
  From: chanaka Udaya, 2019-09-24
• Re: [Question #684080]: Bug in Calculating getSaturation in TwoPhaseFlow Engine
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2019-09-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684080]: Bug in Calculating getSaturation in TwoPhaseFlow Engine
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #684078]: Why is the strain equal to 0 in the triaxial test in my codes?
  From: Rong Zhao, 2019-09-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684078]: Why is the strain equal to 0 in the triaxial test in my codes?
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-10-09
• Re: [Question #684078]: Why is the strain equal to 0 in the triaxial test in my codes?
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2019-10-09
• Re: [Question #684018]: unbreakable clumps to breakable ones(glued spheres)
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684018]: unbreakable clumps to breakable ones(glued spheres)
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-10-08
• Re: [Question #684130]: local variable 'compFricDegree' referenced before assignment
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684130]: local variable 'compFricDegree' referenced before assignment
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-23
• [Question #684130]: local variable 'compFricDegree' referenced before assignment
  From: Rong Zhao, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #684126]: Calculate micro strain field in 2D using TesselationWrapper
  From: JIPEIQI, 2019-09-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684126]: Calculate micro strain field in 2D using TesselationWrapper
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #684126]: Calculate micro strain field in 2D using TesselationWrapper
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-10-08
• [Question #684126]: Calculate micro strain field in 2D using TesselationWrapper
  From: JIPEIQI, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #684117]: Bug in Calculating getSaturation in TwoPhaseFlow Engine
  From: Saeed, 2019-09-22
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684117]: Bug in Calculating getSaturation in TwoPhaseFlow Engine
  From: Saeed, 2019-09-22
• Re: [Question #684117]: Bug in Calculating getSaturation in TwoPhaseFlow Engine
  From: Saeed, 2019-09-22
• Re: [Question #684117]: Bug in Calculating getSaturation in TwoPhaseFlow Engine
  From: Saeed, 2019-09-26
• Re: [Question #684117]: Bug in Calculating getSaturation in TwoPhaseFlow Engine
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-27
• [Question #684117]: Bug in Calculating getSaturation in TwoPhaseFlow Engine
  From: Saeed, 2019-09-22
• Re: [Question #684115]: Some basic concepts in FrictPhys.cpp
  From: gaoxuesong, 2019-09-22
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684115]: Some basic concepts in FrictPhys.cpp
  From: gaoxuesong, 2019-09-22
• Re: [Question #684115]: Some basic concepts in FrictPhys.cpp
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #684115]: Some basic concepts in FrictPhys.cpp
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #684115]: Some basic concepts in FrictPhys.cpp
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #684115]: Some basic concepts in FrictPhys.cpp
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #684115]: Some basic concepts in FrictPhys.cpp
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #684115]: Some basic concepts in FrictPhys.cpp
  From: gaoxuesong, 2019-10-01
• [Question #684115]: Some basic concepts in FrictPhys.cpp
  From: gaoxuesong, 2019-09-22
• Re: [Question #684027]: How to use MatchMaker for two Ip2
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-22
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684027]: How to use MatchMaker for two Ip2
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-22
• Re: [Question #684027]: How to use MatchMaker for two Ip2
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #684027]: How to use MatchMaker for two Ip2
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-10-08
• Re: [Question #684106]: How to increase porosity
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684106]: How to increase porosity
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-22
• Re: [Question #684106]: How to increase porosity
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-22
• Re: [Question #684106]: How to increase porosity
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-22
• Re: [Question #684106]: How to increase porosity
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-24
• Re: [Question #684106]: How to increase porosity
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-24
• Re: [Question #684106]: How to increase porosity
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-24
• Re: [Question #684106]: How to increase porosity
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-24
• [Question #684106]: How to increase porosity
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-21
• Re: [Question #684103]: How to solve the problem of particles penetrating through boundary in triaxial test?
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684103]: How to solve the problem of particles penetrating through boundary in triaxial test?
  From: Rong Zhao, 2019-09-22
• Re: [Question #684103]: How to solve the problem of particles penetrating through boundary in triaxial test?
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-10-08
• [Question #684103]: How to solve the problem of particles penetrating through boundary in triaxial test?
  From: Rong Zhao, 2019-09-21
• Re: [Question #683679]: Scene radius must be positive - Ignoring value
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-09-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #683679]: Scene radius must be positive - Ignoring value
  From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-09-30
• Re: [Question #684081]: Bug in Calculating getSaturation in TwoPhaseFlow Engine
  From: Saeed, 2019-09-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684081]: Bug in Calculating getSaturation in TwoPhaseFlow Engine
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #684081]: Bug in Calculating getSaturation in TwoPhaseFlow Engine
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2019-09-23
• [Question #684081]: Bug in Calculating getSaturation in TwoPhaseFlow Engine
  From: Saeed, 2019-09-20
• [Question #684080]: Bug in Calculating getSaturation in TwoPhaseFlow Engine
  From: Saeed, 2019-09-20
• [Question #684078]: Why is the strain equal to 0 in the triaxial test in my codes?
  From: Rong Zhao, 2019-09-20
• Re: [Question #683642]: How to access the porosity once the compaction is finished in triaxial test?
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-09-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #683642]: How to access the porosity once the compaction is finished in triaxial test?
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #683642]: How to access the porosity once the compaction is finished in triaxial test?
  From: Rong Zhao, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #683642]: How to access the porosity once the compaction is finished in triaxial test?
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #683642]: How to access the porosity once the compaction is finished in triaxial test?
  From: Rong Zhao, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #683642]: How to access the porosity once the compaction is finished in triaxial test?
  From: Rong Zhao, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #684063]: Yade cannot startup. Segmentation fault. 0x00007fffdbce42a9 in GlobalError::PushToStack() () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.5.0
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684063]: Yade cannot startup. Segmentation fault. 0x00007fffdbce42a9 in GlobalError::PushToStack() () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.5.0
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #684063]: Yade cannot startup. Segmentation fault. 0x00007fffdbce42a9 in GlobalError::PushToStack() () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.5.0
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-10-05
• Re: [Question #684063]: Yade cannot startup. Segmentation fault. 0x00007fffdbce42a9 in GlobalError::PushToStack() () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.5.0
  From: Anton Gladky, 2019-10-05
• Re: [Question #684063]: Yade cannot startup. Segmentation fault. 0x00007fffdbce42a9 in GlobalError::PushToStack() () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.5.0
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2020-02-10
• Re: [Question #684062]: TW=TesselationWrapper()
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684062]: TW=TesselationWrapper()
  From: procrastinator, 2019-09-20
• Re: [Question #684062]: TW=TesselationWrapper()
  From: procrastinator, 2019-09-20
• Re: [Question #684062]: TW=TesselationWrapper()
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-20
• Re: [Question #684062]: TW=TesselationWrapper()
  From: procrastinator, 2019-09-20
• Re: [Question #684062]: TW=TesselationWrapper()
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2019-09-24
• Re: [Question #684062]: TW=TesselationWrapper()
  From: procrastinator, 2019-09-24
• [Question #684063]: Yade cannot startup. Segmentation fault. 0x00007fffdbce42a9 in GlobalError::PushToStack() () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.5.0
  From: Christopher Cheung, 2019-09-20
• [Question #684062]: TW=TesselationWrapper()
  From: procrastinator, 2019-09-20
• Re: [Question #684022]: What does dynCell = True mean in PeriTriaxController?
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-19
• Re: [Question #684030]: example of FEMxDEM simulation
  From: whr, 2019-09-19
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684030]: example of FEMxDEM simulation
  From: Alireza Sadeghi, 2019-09-19
• Re: [Question #684030]: example of FEMxDEM simulation
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-19
• Re: [Question #684030]: example of FEMxDEM simulation
  From: Alireza Sadeghi, 2019-09-30
• [Question #684030]: example of FEMxDEM simulation
  From: Alireza Sadeghi, 2019-09-18
• [Question #684027]: How to use MatchMaker for two Ip2
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-18
• [Question #684022]: What does dynCell = True mean in PeriTriaxController?
  From: Rong Zhao, 2019-09-18
• Re: [Question #684021]: CHOLMOD warning: matrix not positive definite
  From: Chu, 2019-09-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684021]: CHOLMOD warning: matrix not positive definite
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-19
• Re: [Question #684021]: CHOLMOD warning: matrix not positive definite
  From: Chu, 2019-09-20
• Re: [Question #684021]: CHOLMOD warning: matrix not positive definite
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-10-05
• [Question #684021]: CHOLMOD warning: matrix not positive definite
  From: Chu, 2019-09-18
• [Question #684018]: unbreakable clumps to breakable ones(glued spheres)
  From: Ali Rafiee, 2019-09-18
• Re: [Question #684008]: aabb walls don't move after apply a force
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #684008]: aabb walls don't move after apply a force
  From: Anqi H, 2019-09-18
• Re: [Question #684008]: aabb walls don't move after apply a force
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-22
• [Question #684008]: aabb walls don't move after apply a force
  From: Anqi H, 2019-09-18
• Re: [Question #683981]: What does 'rMean=-1' mean
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-17
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #683981]: What does 'rMean=-1' mean
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-17
• Re: [Question #683981]: What does 'rMean=-1' mean
  From: Rong Zhao, 2019-10-07
• Re: [Question #683981]: What does 'rMean=-1' mean
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-10-07
• Re: [Question #683967]: GlobalStiffnessTimeStepper with Potential Blocks
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-17
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #683967]: GlobalStiffnessTimeStepper with Potential Blocks
  From: Janek Kozicki, 2019-09-17
• Re: [Question #683967]: GlobalStiffnessTimeStepper with Potential Blocks
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2019-09-17
• Re: [Question #683967]: GlobalStiffnessTimeStepper with Potential Blocks
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2019-09-17
• Re: [Question #683967]: GlobalStiffnessTimeStepper with Potential Blocks
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2019-09-17
• Re: [Question #683967]: GlobalStiffnessTimeStepper with Potential Blocks
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2019-09-17
• Re: [Question #683967]: GlobalStiffnessTimeStepper with Potential Blocks
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2019-09-17
• Re: [Question #683967]: GlobalStiffnessTimeStepper with Potential Blocks
  From: Janek Kozicki, 2019-09-18
• [Question #683981]: What does 'rMean=-1' mean
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-17
• [Question #683967]: GlobalStiffnessTimeStepper with Potential Blocks
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2019-09-16
• Re: [Question #683949]: particle position data
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #683949]: particle position data
  From: Jinny Kim, 2019-09-16
• Re: [Question #683949]: particle position data
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-17
• Re: [Question #683949]: particle position data
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-10-02
• [Question #683952]: Cleaning up Shediac a week after Dorian
  From: palal, 2019-09-16
• [Question #683950]: Nemak employees return to work after Unifor tears down blockade
  From: danute28, 2019-09-16
• [Question #683949]: particle position data
  From: Jinny Kim, 2019-09-16
• Re: [Question #683946]: How to update yade (stable) version
  From: A Dinesh, 2019-09-15
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #683946]: How to update yade (stable) version
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-16
• Re: [Question #683946]: How to update yade (stable) version
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-16
• Re: [Question #683946]: How to update yade (stable) version
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-16
• Re: [Question #683946]: How to update yade (stable) version
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-16
• [Question #683946]: How to update yade (stable) version
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-15
• Re: [Question #683934]: Bond broken and non movement of cohesive particles
  From: Akm, 2019-09-15
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #683934]: Bond broken and non movement of cohesive particles
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-16
• Re: [Question #683934]: Bond broken and non movement of cohesive particles
  From: Akm, 2019-09-18
• Re: [Question #683934]: Bond broken and non movement of cohesive particles
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-18
• Re: [Question #683934]: Bond broken and non movement of cohesive particles
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-10-03
• [Question #683934]: Bond broken and non movement of cohesive particles
  From: Akm, 2019-09-15
• Re: [Question #683913]: ThermalEngine not defined/active yet?
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #683913]: ThermalEngine not defined/active yet?
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-14
• Re: [Question #683913]: ThermalEngine not defined/active yet?
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-15
• Re: [Question #683913]: ThermalEngine not defined/active yet?
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-15
• [Question #683913]: ThermalEngine not defined/active yet?
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-14
• Re: [Question #683870]: install yadedaily
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-12
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #683870]: install yadedaily
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-12
• Re: [Question #683870]: install yadedaily
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-09-28
• Re: [Question #683856]: Segmentation fault (core dumped) after erase some bodies
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-12
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #683856]: Segmentation fault (core dumped) after erase some bodies
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-13
• [Question #683870]: install yadedaily
  From: Xue, 2019-09-12
• [Question #683856]: Segmentation fault (core dumped) after erase some bodies
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-11
• Re: [Question #683855]: Unbreakable bonds in Tension Test
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-11
• [Question #683855]: Unbreakable bonds in Tension Test
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-11
• Re: [Question #683851]: contact detection between polyhedra and sphere
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-11
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #683851]: contact detection between polyhedra and sphere
  From: lip, 2019-09-11
• Re: [Question #683851]: contact detection between polyhedra and sphere
  From: A Dinesh, 2019-09-12
• Re: [Question #683851]: contact detection between polyhedra and sphere
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-12
• Re: [Question #683851]: contact detection between polyhedra and sphere
  From: lip, 2019-09-12
• Re: [Question #683851]: contact detection between polyhedra and sphere
  From: A Dinesh, 2019-09-12
• Re: [Question #683851]: contact detection between polyhedra and sphere
  From: A Dinesh, 2019-09-12
• Re: [Question #683851]: contact detection between polyhedra and sphere
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-12
• [Question #683851]: contact detection between polyhedra and sphere
  From: lip, 2019-09-11
• Re: [Question #683821]: Can not see existed particles in "show 3D"
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-10
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #683821]: Can not see existed particles in "show 3D"
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-10
• Re: [Question #683821]: Can not see existed particles in "show 3D"
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-10
• Re: [Question #683821]: Can not see existed particles in "show 3D"
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-11
• Re: [Question #683821]: Can not see existed particles in "show 3D"
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-11
• Re: [Question #683821]: Can not see existed particles in "show 3D"
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-11
• Re: [Question #683821]: Can not see existed particles in "show 3D"
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-11
• [Question #683833]: class yade.wrapper.PDFEngine
  From: procrastinator, 2019-09-10
• [Question #683821]: Can not see existed particles in "show 3D"
  From: Leonard, 2019-09-10
• Re: [Question #683819]: Error during installation: libyade.so
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-10
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #683819]: Error during installation: libyade.so
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-10
• Re: [Question #683819]: Error during installation: libyade.so
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-10
• Re: [Question #683819]: Error during installation: libyade.so
  From: YUFAN ZHAO, 2019-09-11
• Re: [Question #683819]: Error during installation: libyade.so
  From: YUFAN ZHAO, 2019-09-11
• Re: [Question #683819]: Error during installation: libyade.so
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-11
• Re: [Question #683819]: Error during installation: libyade.so
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2019-09-11
• Re: [Question #683819]: Error during installation: libyade.so
  From: YUFAN ZHAO, 2019-09-13
• Re: [Question #683819]: Error during installation: libyade.so
  From: YUFAN ZHAO, 2019-09-13
• Re: [Question #683819]: Error during installation: libyade.so
  From: YUFAN ZHAO, 2019-09-15
• Re: [Question #683819]: Error during installation: libyade.so
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-16
• Re: [Question #683819]: Error during installation: libyade.so
  From: YUFAN ZHAO, 2019-09-24
• [Question #683819]: Error during installation: libyade.so
  From: YUFAN ZHAO, 2019-09-10
• Re: [Question #683770]: YAde on OpenSUSE
  From: Robert Caulk, 2019-09-10
• [Question #683790]: RockBolt engine
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-09
• [Question #683787]: Using ForceEngine to break a single JCFpm bond
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-09
• Re: [Question #683787]: Using ForceEngine to break a single JCFpm bond
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-09
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #683787]: Using ForceEngine to break a single JCFpm bond
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #683787]: Using ForceEngine to break a single JCFpm bond
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-23
• Re: [Question #683787]: Using ForceEngine to break a single JCFpm bond
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2019-09-24
• Re: [Question #683787]: Using ForceEngine to break a single JCFpm bond
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-24
• Re: [Question #683787]: Using ForceEngine to break a single JCFpm bond
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-24
• Re: [Question #683787]: Using ForceEngine to break a single JCFpm bond
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2019-09-25
• Re: [Question #683787]: Using ForceEngine to break a single JCFpm bond
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-25
• Re: [Question #683787]: Using ForceEngine to break a single JCFpm bond
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-25
• Re: [Question #683787]: Using ForceEngine to break a single JCFpm bond
  From: Yaniv Fogel, 2019-09-25
• Re: [Question #683776]: Some Problems about Direct Shear Test
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-09
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #683776]: Some Problems about Direct Shear Test
  From: Xue lihua, 2019-09-10
• Re: [Question #683776]: Some Problems about Direct Shear Test
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-09-10
• Re: [Question #683776]: Some Problems about Direct Shear Test
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-09-25

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status