yade-users team mailing list archive

1. yade-users team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the yade-users mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• Re: [Question #690684]: definition of iphys in the .hpp file related to a contact law, (continued)
  • Re: [Question #690684]: definition of iphys in the .hpp file related to a contact law
    From: Rioual, 2020-05-14
• [Question #690684]: definition of iphys in the .hpp file related to a contact law
  From: Rioual, 2020-05-13
• Re: [Question #690248]: How to reach target confining pressure in triaxial simulation
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2020-05-13
• Re: [Question #690655]: Testing the implémentation of a new contact law
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-05-12
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690655]: Testing the implémentation of a new contact law
  From: Rioual, 2020-05-12
• Re: [Question #690655]: Testing the implémentation of a new contact law
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-05-12
• Re: [Question #690655]: Testing the implémentation of a new contact law
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-05-12
• Re: [Question #690655]: Testing the implémentation of a new contact law
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2020-05-13
• Re: [Question #690655]: Testing the implémentation of a new contact law
  From: Rioual, 2020-05-13
• [Question #690655]: Testing the implémentation of a new contact law
  From: Rioual, 2020-05-12
• Re: [Question #690618]: How to define Axis-Aligned Bounding Box more accurately in the irregular polyhedron of Potential Blocks?
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2020-05-11
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690618]: How to define Axis-Aligned Bounding Box more accurately in the irregular polyhedron of Potential Blocks?
  From: weijie, 2020-05-18
• Re: [Question #690619]: A problem with the LSMGenGeo library
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-05-11
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690619]: A problem with the LSMGenGeo library
  From: Son Tung Dang, 2020-05-18
• Re: [Question #690619]: A problem with the LSMGenGeo library
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2020-06-02
• [Question #690619]: A problem with the LSMGenGeo library
  From: Son Tung Dang, 2020-05-11
• [Question #690618]: How to define Axis-Aligned Bounding Box more accurately in the irregular polyhedron of Potential Blocks?
  From: weijie, 2020-05-11
• Re: [Question #690586]: summary force of O.forces.setPermF and reaction force from the particles to the footing .Is it correct ?
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-05-10
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690586]: summary force of O.forces.setPermF and reaction force from the particles to the footing .Is it correct ?
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-05-10
• [Question #690586]: summary force of O.forces.setPermF and reaction force from the particles to the footing .Is it correct ?
  From: Bowonchanok Maneerat, 2020-05-10
• Re: [Question #690574]: Force is the point load or uniform load ?
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-05-09
• [Question #690574]: Force is the point load or uniform load ?
  From: veerawat, 2020-05-09
• [Question #690573]: Permeability
  From: Guilherme das Neves Seguro, 2020-05-09
• Re: [Question #690554]: How the most sphere particles does anyone have made in simulation at once ?
  From: Robert Caulk, 2020-05-08
• Re: [Question #690565]: Yade on redhat
  From: Robert Caulk, 2020-05-08
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690565]: Yade on redhat
  From: Roozbeh Rezakhani, 2020-05-08
• [Question #690565]: Yade on redhat
  From: Roozbeh Rezakhani, 2020-05-08
• [Question #690554]: How the most sphere particles does anyone have made in simulation at once ?
  From: veerawat, 2020-05-08
• Re: [Question #690546]: How to quickly reduce unbalancedForce to approximate 0?
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2020-05-08
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690546]: How to quickly reduce unbalancedForce to approximate 0?
  From: weijie, 2020-05-09
• Re: [Question #690546]: How to quickly reduce unbalancedForce to approximate 0?
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2020-05-09
• Re: [Question #690546]: How to quickly reduce unbalancedForce to approximate 0?
  From: weijie, 2020-05-10
• Re: [Question #690546]: How to quickly reduce unbalancedForce to approximate 0?
  From: weijie, 2020-05-11
• Re: [Question #690546]: How to quickly reduce unbalancedForce to approximate 0?
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2020-05-11
• Re: [Question #690546]: How to quickly reduce unbalancedForce to approximate 0?
  From: weijie, 2020-05-12
• Re: [Question #690546]: How to quickly reduce unbalancedForce to approximate 0?
  From: weijie, 2020-05-12
• Re: [Question #690546]: How to quickly reduce unbalancedForce to approximate 0?
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2020-05-12
• Re: [Question #690546]: How to quickly reduce unbalancedForce to approximate 0?
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2020-05-12
• Re: [Question #690546]: How to quickly reduce unbalancedForce to approximate 0?
  From: weijie, 2020-05-18
• Re: [Question #690546]: How to quickly reduce unbalancedForce to approximate 0?
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2020-05-18
• [Question #690546]: How to quickly reduce unbalancedForce to approximate 0?
  From: weijie, 2020-05-08
• [Question #690526]: the difference of contact models for 1-D compression simulation
  From: SayedHessam, 2020-05-07
• Re: [Question #690509]: MatplotlibDeprecationWarning:axes.color_cycle is deprecated and replaced with axes.prop_cycle; please use the latter.
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2020-05-07
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690509]: MatplotlibDeprecationWarning:axes.color_cycle is deprecated and replaced with axes.prop_cycle; please use the latter.
  From: weijie, 2020-05-08
• Re: [Question #690521]: Exponential softening shear force after peak- model implementation
  From: chanaka Udaya, 2020-05-07
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690521]: Exponential softening shear force after peak- model implementation
  From: chanaka Udaya, 2020-05-07
• Re: [Question #690521]: Exponential softening shear force after peak- model implementation
  From: chanaka Udaya, 2020-05-07
• Re: [Question #690521]: Exponential softening shear force after peak- model implementation
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-05-07
• Re: [Question #690521]: Exponential softening shear force after peak- model implementation
  From: chanaka Udaya, 2020-05-07
• Re: [Question #690521]: Exponential softening shear force after peak- model implementation
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-05-07
• Re: [Question #690521]: Exponential softening shear force after peak- model implementation
  From: chanaka Udaya, 2020-05-19
• [Question #690521]: Exponential softening shear force after peak-implimentation
  From: chanaka Udaya, 2020-05-07
• [Question #690509]: MatplotlibDeprecationWarning:axes.color_cycle is deprecated and replaced with axes.prop_cycle; please use the latter.
  From: weijie, 2020-05-06
• Re: [Question #690076]: How to set zero compressive stiffness for Pfacets ?
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2020-05-06
• Re: [Question #690494]: How to simulate the dispersion process of agglomerated particles with YADE and Open FOAM?
  From: Fenfen Fenda Florena, 2020-05-06
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690494]: How to simulate the dispersion process of agglomerated particles with YADE and Open FOAM?
  From: Deepak, 2020-05-10
• Re: [Question #690494]: How to simulate the dispersion process of agglomerated particles with YADE and Open FOAM?
  From: Robert Caulk, 2020-05-17
• Re: [Question #690494]: How to simulate the dispersion process of agglomerated particles with YADE and Open FOAM?
  From: Fenfen Fenda Florena, 2020-05-23
• [Question #690494]: How to simulate the dispersion process of agglomerated particles with YADE and Open FOAM?
  From: Fenfen Fenda Florena, 2020-05-06
• Re: [Question #690438]: How to generate a regular dodecahedron in polyhedra_utils module？
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2020-05-04
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690438]: How to generate a regular dodecahedron in polyhedra_utils module？
  From: weijie, 2020-05-05
• Re: [Question #690438]: How to generate a regular dodecahedron in polyhedra_utils module？
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2020-05-05
• Re: [Question #690438]: How to generate a regular dodecahedron in polyhedra_utils module？
  From: weijie, 2020-05-06
• [Question #690438]: How to generate a regular dodecahedron in polyhedra_utils module？
  From: weijie, 2020-05-04
• Re: [Question #690433]: UNV Reader
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-05-04
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690433]: UNV Reader
  From: Przemek, 2020-05-04
• Re: [Question #690433]: UNV Reader
  From: Przemek, 2020-05-04
• [Question #690433]: UNV Reader
  From: Przemek, 2020-05-04
• Re: [Question #690366]: branch vector & contact normal
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-05-01
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690366]: branch vector & contact normal
  From: nobody, 2020-05-01
• Re: [Question #690366]: branch vector & contact normal
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-05-02
• Re: [Question #690348]: How to use getDepthProfiles() with an example of code?
  From: Robert Caulk, 2020-05-01
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690348]: How to use getDepthProfiles() with an example of code?
  From: Kevin, 2020-05-01
• Re: [Question #690348]: How to use getDepthProfiles() with an example of code?
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2020-05-16
• [Question #690366]: branch vector & contact normal
  From: nobody, 2020-05-01
• [Question #690348]: How to use getDepthProfiles() with an example of code?
  From: Kevin, 2020-04-30
• Re: [Question #690224]: Obtaining Volume Fraction of Filled Cylinder
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2020-04-30
• Re: [Question #690280]: Implementing a new contact law very different from the usual ones
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-28
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690280]: Implementing a new contact law very different from the usual ones
  From: Rioual, 2020-05-11
• Re: [Question #690280]: Implementing a new contact law very different from the usual ones
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-05-11
• Re: [Question #690280]: Implementing a new contact law very different from the usual ones
  From: Rioual, 2020-05-11
• Re: [Question #690280]: Implementing a new contact law very different from the usual ones
  From: Robert Caulk, 2020-05-11
• Re: [Question #690280]: Implementing a new contact law very different from the usual ones
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-05-11
• Re: [Question #690280]: Implementing a new contact law very different from the usual ones
  From: Rioual, 2020-05-12
• [Question #690280]: Implementing a new contact law very different from the usual ones
  From: Rioual, 2020-04-28
• Re: [Question #690274]: installation
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-28
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690274]: installation
  From: LiKang, 2020-04-28
• Re: [Question #690274]: installation
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-28
• Re: [Question #690274]: installation
  From: LiKang, 2020-04-28
• Re: [Question #690274]: installation
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-28
• Re: [Question #690274]: installation
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-28
• Re: [Question #690274]: installation
  From: LiKang, 2020-04-28
• Re: [Question #690274]: installation
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-28
• Re: [Question #690274]: installation
  From: LiKang, 2020-04-28
• Re: [Question #690274]: installation
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-28
• Re: [Question #690274]: installation
  From: LiKang, 2020-04-29
• Re: [Question #690274]: installation
  From: LiKang, 2020-04-29
• [Question #690274]: installation
  From: LiKang, 2020-04-28
• Re: [Question #690262]: predicte
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-28
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690262]: predicte
  From: nobody, 2020-04-29
• Re: [Question #690262]: predicte
  From: nobody, 2020-04-29
• [Question #690262]: predicte
  From: nobody, 2020-04-28
• [Question #690248]: How to reach target confining pressure in triaxial simulation
  From: Leonard, 2020-04-27
• Re: [Question #690234]: Using O.forces without Ip2 and Law2
  From: Robert Caulk, 2020-04-27
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690234]: Using O.forces without Ip2 and Law2
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2020-04-27
• Re: [Question #690234]: Using O.forces without Ip2 and Law2
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-27
• Re: [Question #690234]: Using O.forces without Ip2 and Law2
  From: Rioual, 2020-04-27
• Re: [Question #690234]: Using O.forces without Ip2 and Law2
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-27
• Re: [Question #690234]: Using O.forces without Ip2 and Law2
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2020-05-13
• [Question #690234]: Using O.forces without Ip2 and Law2
  From: Rioual, 2020-04-27
• [Question #690224]: Obtaining Volume Fraction of Filled Cylinder
  From: Kevin, 2020-04-26
• Re: [Question #690171]: the particles float after compaction
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-26
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690171]: the particles float after compaction
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2020-05-11
• Re: [Question #690172]: the particles float after compaction
  From: veerawat, 2020-04-24
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690172]: the particles float after compaction
  From: Robert Caulk, 2020-04-27
• Re: [Question #690172]: the particles float after compaction
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-27
• [Question #690172]: the particles float after compaction
  From: veerawat, 2020-04-24
• [Question #690171]: the particles float after compaction
  From: veerawat, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690160]: i.geom.incidentVel is not a vector
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2020-04-24
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690160]: i.geom.incidentVel is not a vector
  From: Rioual, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690160]: i.geom.incidentVel is not a vector
  From: Rioual, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690160]: i.geom.incidentVel is not a vector
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-26
• Re: [Question #690160]: i.geom.incidentVel is not a vector
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2020-04-27
• Re: [Question #690160]: i.geom.incidentVel is not a vector
  From: Rioual, 2020-04-27
• Re: [Question #690160]: i.geom.incidentVel is not a vector
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2020-04-27
• [Question #690160]: i.geom.incidentVel is not a vector
  From: Rioual, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690122]: Energy tracking functions
  From: Stefano Simone, 2020-04-24
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690122]: Energy tracking functions
  From: Stefano Simone, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690122]: Energy tracking functions
  From: Stefano Simone, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690146]: why do the particles escape from the box?
  From: Robert Caulk, 2020-04-24
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690146]: why do the particles escape from the box?
  From: nobody, 2020-04-24
• [Question #690146]: why do the particles escape from the box?
  From: Liu Zhiruo, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690122]: Modelling a shearing rigid box for dissipation control
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2020-04-24
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690122]: Modelling a shearing rigid box for dissipation control
  From: Stefano Simone, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690122]: Modelling a shearing rigid box for dissipation control
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690088]: Simulating a brush
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690128]: how to make a spherical polyhedra using Potential Blocks?
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2020-04-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690128]: how to make a spherical polyhedra using Potential Blocks?
  From: Liu Zhiruo, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690128]: how to make a spherical polyhedra using Potential Blocks?
  From: Liu Zhiruo, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Przemek, 2020-04-23
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Przemek, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Przemek, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Robert Caulk, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Przemek, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Przemek, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Robert Caulk, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Przemek, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Robert Caulk, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Przemek, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Przemek, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-26
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Przemek, 2020-04-26
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-26
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Przemek, 2020-04-26
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-26
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-26
• Re: [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Przemek, 2020-04-27
• [Question #690128]: how to make a spherical polyhedra using Potential Blocks?
  From: Liu Zhiruo, 2020-04-23
• [Question #690127]: Missing particles in VTK
  From: Przemek, 2020-04-23
• [Question #690122]: Modelling a shearing rigid box for dissipation control
  From: Stefano Simone, 2020-04-23
• Re: [Question #690111]: Is there a way to generate joints in irregular polyhedra?
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2020-04-22
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690111]: Is there a way to generate joints in irregular polyhedra?
  From: weijie, 2020-04-23
• Re: [Question #690111]: Is there a way to generate joints in irregular polyhedra?
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2020-04-23
• Re: [Question #690111]: Is there a way to generate joints in irregular polyhedra?
  From: weijie, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690111]: Is there a way to generate joints in irregular polyhedra?
  From: Vasileios Angelidakis, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690111]: Is there a way to generate joints in irregular polyhedra?
  From: weijie, 2020-05-04
• [Question #690111]: Is there a way to generate joints in irregular polyhedra?
  From: weijie, 2020-04-22
• Re: [Question #690104]: torque
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2020-04-22
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690104]: torque
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-22
• Re: [Question #690104]: torque
  From: nobody, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690104]: torque
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690104]: torque
  From: nobody, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690104]: torque
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690104]: torque
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690104]: torque
  From: nobody, 2020-04-24
• Re: [Question #690104]: torque
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-26
• Re: [Question #690104]: torque
  From: nobody, 2020-04-28
• Re: [Question #690104]: torque
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-28
• Re: [Question #690104]: torque
  From: nobody, 2020-04-29
• Re: [Question #690104]: torque
  From: nobody, 2020-04-29
• [Question #690104]: torque
  From: nobody, 2020-04-22
• Re: [Question #690057]: appropriate of porosity
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690057]: appropriate of porosity
  From: nobody, 2020-04-21
• Re: [Question #690057]: appropriate of porosity
  From: nobody, 2020-04-21
• [Question #690088]: Simulating a brush
  From: Rohit John, 2020-04-21
• Re: [Question #690020]: Rolling friction coefficient in Hertz-Mindlin contact law
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2020-04-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690020]: Rolling friction coefficient in Hertz-Mindlin contact law
  From: Chien-Cheng Hung, 2020-04-22
• Re: [Question #690079]: local coordination number
  From: nobody, 2020-04-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690079]: local coordination number
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-21
• Re: [Question #690079]: local coordination number
  From: nobody, 2020-04-21
• Re: [Question #690079]: local coordination number
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-21
• Re: [Question #690079]: local coordination number
  From: nobody, 2020-04-21
• Re: [Question #690079]: local coordination number
  From: nobody, 2020-04-21
• [Question #690079]: local coordination number
  From: nobody, 2020-04-20
• [Question #690076]: How to set zero compressive stiffness for Pfacets ?
  From: Erik Lovdahl, 2020-04-20
• Re: [Question #690066]: Using O.forces along normal and tangential directions at contact
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #690066]: Using O.forces along normal and tangential directions at contact
  From: Jan Stránský, 2020-04-20
• Re: [Question #690066]: Using O.forces along normal and tangential directions at contact
  From: Rioual, 2020-04-21

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status