duplicity-team team mailing list archive

1. duplicity-team team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the duplicity-team mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• [Merge] lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-log-codes3 into lp:duplicity, (continued)
  • [Merge] lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-log-codes3 into lp:duplicity
    From: noreply, 2010-12-26
• Re: [Question #136099]: Using duplicity for Amazon S3 backup
  From: edso, 2010-11-30
• [Question #136099]: Using duplicity for Amazon S3 backup
  From: Ori Idan, 2010-11-30
• [Question #128051]: Status of bug #655468 changed to 'Fix Released' in Duplicity
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-11-20
• [Question #130310]: Status of bug #674506 changed to 'Fix Released' in Duplicity
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-11-20
• [Question #130310]: Status of bug #674506 changed to 'Fix Released' in duplicity in ubuntu
  From: Elliot Murphy, 2010-11-17
• Re: [Question #133863]: Is it possible to make incremental backups while the full backup runs?
  From: edso, 2010-11-13
• Re: [Question #133863]: Is it possible to make incremental backups while the full backup runs?
  From: edgar . soldin, 2010-11-13
• Re: [Question #133863]: Is it possible to make incremental backups while the full backup runs?
  From: edso, 2010-11-13
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #133863]: Is it possible to make incremental backups while the full backup runs?
  From: Patrick Allemann, 2010-11-13
• Re: [Question #133863]: Is it possible to make incremental backups while the full backup runs?
  From: Allo, 2011-06-01
• Re: [Question #133863]: Is it possible to make incremental backups while the full backup runs?
  From: Adam Porter, 2011-06-02
• Re: [Question #133863]: Is it possible to make incremental backups while the full backup runs?
  From: edso, 2011-06-02
• [Question #133863]: Is it possible to make incremental backups while the full backup runs?
  From: Patrick Allemann, 2010-11-13
• [Question #130310]: Status of bug #674506 changed to 'Fix Committed' in Duplicity
  From: edso, 2010-11-12
• Ubuntu One Backend
  From: Michael Terry, 2010-11-10
• Re: Ubuntu One Backend
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-11-10
• Re: [Question #132136]: Is it possible to recreate the manifest?
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-11-01
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #132136]: Is it possible to recreate the manifest?
  From: Niels Ganser, 2010-11-02
• Re: [Question #132136]: Is it possible to recreate the manifest?
  From: Niels Ganser, 2010-11-02
• [Question #132136]: Is it possible to recreate the manifest?
  From: Niels Ganser, 2010-11-01
• Re: [Question #131914]: Backup File Name Prefix
  From: edso, 2010-10-31
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #131914]: Backup File Name Prefix
  From: Kip Warner, 2010-10-31
• Re: [Question #131914]: Backup File Name Prefix
  From: Nguyen Quoc Mai, 2012-01-19
• Re: [Question #131914]: Backup File Name Prefix
  From: Kip Warner, 2012-01-19
• [Question #131914]: Backup File Name Prefix
  From: Kip Warner, 2010-10-31
• [Merge] lp:~kevinoid/duplicity/windows-port into lp:duplicity/0.6-series
  From: Kevin Locke, 2010-10-25
• [Merge] lp:~kevinoid/duplicity/windows-port into lp:duplicity
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2013-12-28
• Re: [Merge] lp:~kevinoid/duplicity/windows-port into lp:duplicity
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2013-12-28
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: Paul Hassinger, 2010-10-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: Paul Hassinger, 2010-10-20
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: Paul Hassinger, 2010-10-20
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: Paul Hassinger, 2010-10-20
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: Paul Hassinger, 2010-10-20
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: edso, 2010-10-20
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: Paul Hassinger, 2010-10-27
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: Paul Hassinger, 2010-10-27
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: Paul Hassinger, 2010-10-27
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: Paul Hassinger, 2010-10-27
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: edso, 2010-10-27
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: edso, 2010-10-27
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: edso, 2010-11-12
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: edso, 2010-11-12
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: edso, 2010-11-12
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: Elliot Murphy, 2010-11-17
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: Jamie Lokier, 2011-01-03
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: edso, 2011-01-04
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: robegue, 2011-02-21
• Re: [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: robegue, 2011-02-21
• [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: Paul Hassinger, 2010-10-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Question #130310]: AttributeError: RsyncBackend instance has no attribute 'subprocess_popen_persist'
  From: edso, 2010-11-12
• [Merge] lp:~mbp/duplicity/433970-non-ssl into lp:duplicity/0.6-series
  From: Martin Pool, 2010-10-13
• [Merge] lp:~mbp/duplicity/433970-non-ssl into lp:duplicity/0.6-series
  From: noreply, 2010-11-20
• [Merge] lp:~mbp/duplicity/433970-non-ssl into lp:duplicity
  From: Martin Pool, 2010-10-13
• Re: [Merge] lp:~mbp/duplicity/433970-non-ssl into lp:duplicity
  From: Martin Pool, 2010-10-13
• [Merge] lp:~mbp/duplicity/433970-non-ssl into lp:duplicity/0.7-series
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2011-03-06
• Re: [Question #126356]: Using verify to check backups with complex include/exclude lists
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2010-10-11
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #126356]: Using verify to check backups with complex include/exclude lists
  From: edso, 2010-10-11
• Re: [Question #126356]: Using verify to check backups with complex include/exclude lists
  From: edso, 2010-10-11
• Re: [Question #126356]: Using verify to check backups with complex include/exclude lists
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2010-10-28
• [Question #128051]: Status of bug #655468 changed to 'Fix Committed' in Duplicity
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-10-06
• [Question #128051]: Status of bug #655468 changed to 'In Progress' in Duplicity
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-10-06
• Re: [Question #128051]: Install: UnsupportedBackendScheme: scheme not supported in url: s3+http://foo.woof.com/?
  From: LarryK, 2010-10-06
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #128051]: Install: UnsupportedBackendScheme: scheme not supported in url: s3+http://foo.woof.com/?
  From: edso, 2010-10-06
• Re: [Question #128051]: Install: UnsupportedBackendScheme: scheme not supported in url: s3+http://foo.woof.com/?
  From: edso, 2010-10-06
• Re: [Question #128051]: Install: UnsupportedBackendScheme: scheme not supported in url: s3+http://foo.woof.com/?
  From: Maarten Kossen, 2010-10-06
• Re: [Question #128051]: Install: UnsupportedBackendScheme: scheme not supported in url: s3+http://foo.woof.com/?
  From: Maarten Kossen, 2010-10-06
• Re: [Question #128051]: Install: UnsupportedBackendScheme: scheme not supported in url: s3+http://foo.woof.com/?
  From: LarryK, 2010-10-06
• Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs
  From: deryck . hodge, 2010-10-06
• [Question #128051]: Install: UnsupportedBackendScheme: scheme not supported in url: s3+http://foo.woof.com/?
  From: LarryK, 2010-10-05
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Question #128051]: Install: UnsupportedBackendScheme: scheme not supported in url: s3+http://foo.woof.com/?
  From: LarryK, 2010-10-06
• [Question #126356]: Using verify to check backups with complex include/exclude lists
  From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-09-22
• Re: [Question #121732]: Error running on RHEL 4?
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2010-09-04
• Re: [Question #121479]: Is there a way to have rolling incremental backups?
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2010-09-02
• Re: [Question #123555]: How to install duplicity on SUSE?
  From: edso, 2010-09-01
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #123555]: How to install duplicity on SUSE?
  From: Rodrigo Alvarez, 2010-09-01
• Re: [Question #123555]: How to install duplicity on SUSE?
  From: edso, 2010-09-02
• [Question #123555]: How to install duplicity on SUSE?
  From: Rodrigo Alvarez, 2010-08-31
• [Question #121732]: Error running on RHEL 4?
  From: sam s, 2010-08-18
• [Question #121479]: Is there a way to have rolling incremental backups?
  From: Shot, 2010-08-17
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-07-22
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-07-23
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-07-24
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-07-24
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-07-26
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-08-05
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-08-09
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-08-09
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-08-26
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-09-06
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-09-06
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-09-19
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-10-06
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-10-25
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-11-20
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-11-20
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.6-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-11-27
• Re: [Question #118297]: Breakage after trying to restart inc backup
  From: edso, 2010-07-20
• [Question #118297]: Breakage after trying to restart inc backup
  From: Alex Kapranoff, 2010-07-20
• Re: [Question #117829]: Size of signature files 8-80x larger that the diffs
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-07-18
• Re: [Question #118161]: Efficiency of doing full backups to s3
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-07-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #118161]: Efficiency of doing full backups to s3
  From: dfalk, 2010-07-22
• [Question #118161]: Efficiency of doing full backups to s3
  From: dfalk, 2010-07-18
• [Question #117829]: Size of signature files 8-80x larger that the diffs
  From: spooky, 2010-07-15
• Re: [Question #117790]: Rsync options feature to allow input rsync password by file
  From: edso, 2010-07-15
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #117790]: Rsync options feature to allow input rsync password by file
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2010-07-30
• [Question #117790]: Rsync options feature to allow input rsync password by file
  From: Orair, 2010-07-15
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #115570]: Volume size: Pros and Cons of big Volumes?
  From: edso, 2010-07-05
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-04
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-05
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: edso, 2010-07-07
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-09-20
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-09-20
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-09-20
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-09-21
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-09-22
• [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-07-04
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-04
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-07-05
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-05
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-05
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: edso, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: edso, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: edso, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-05
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: edso, 2010-07-06
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-04
• [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-07-05
• [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-05
• Re: [Question #115570]: Volume size: Pros and Cons of big Volumes?
  From: Peter Schuller, 2010-06-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #115570]: Volume size: Pros and Cons of big Volumes?
  From: Rodrigo Alvarez, 2010-06-23
• Re: [Question #115570]: Volume size: Pros and Cons of big Volumes?
  From: Rodrigo Alvarez, 2010-07-05
• [Question #115570]: Volume size: Pros and Cons of big Volumes?
  From: Rodrigo Alvarez, 2010-06-23
• Re: [Question #115018]: Version interoperability.
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-06-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #115018]: Version interoperability.
  From: dcaban, 2010-06-18
• Re: [Question #115018]: Version interoperability.
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-06-18
• Re: [Question #115018]: Version interoperability.
  From: dcaban, 2010-06-18
• Re: [Question #115018]: Version interoperability.
  From: dcaban, 2010-06-18
• [Question #115018]: Version interoperability.
  From: dcaban, 2010-06-18
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.7-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-05-28
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.7-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-07-22
• Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.7-series
  From: rosetta, 2010-08-26
• Upgrade of Branches to 2a Format
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-27
• Re: Upgrade of Branches to 2a Format
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-06-18
• Re: [Question #109976]: Is it possible to encrypt to both a private key and a passphrase
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2010-05-22
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #109976]: Is it possible to encrypt to both a private key and a passphrase
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-22
• Re: [Question #109976]: Is it possible to encrypt to both a private key and a passphrase
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-22
• Re: [Question #111507]: Progress of something happening or better yet, time left
  From: Andrew Fister, 2010-05-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #111507]: Progress of something happening or better yet, time left
  From: someone1, 2010-05-18
• Re: [Question #111507]: Progress of something happening or better yet, time left
  From: someone1, 2010-05-19
• Re: [Question #111507]: Progress of something happening or better yet, time left
  From: hefee, 2010-08-16
• [Question #111507]: Progress of something happening or better yet, time left
  From: someone1, 2010-05-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Question #111507]: Progress of something happening or better yet, time left
  From: someone1, 2010-05-18
• [Merge] lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-log-codes into lp:duplicity
  From: Michael Terry, 2010-05-15
• Re: [Merge] lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-log-codes into lp:duplicity
  From: Michael Terry, 2010-05-15
• Re: [Merge] lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-log-codes into lp:duplicity
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-24
• Re: [Merge] lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-log-codes into lp:duplicity
  From: Michael Terry, 2010-05-27
• Re: [Merge] lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-log-codes into lp:duplicity
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-27
• [Merge] lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-log-codes into lp:duplicity
  From: noreply, 2010-07-22
• [Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
  From: Olivier Berger, 2010-05-12
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
  From: Olivier Berger, 2010-05-12
• [Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
  From: Dirk Leinenbach, 2010-05-12
• [Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
  From: Olivier Berger, 2010-05-13
• [Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
  From: Olivier Berger, 2010-05-13
• [Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-23
• [Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-07-23
• [Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-07-23
• [Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-07-25
• [Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
  From: ben, 2012-07-16
• [Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
  From: ben, 2012-07-16
• Releases
  From: Michael Terry, 2010-05-11
• Re: Releases
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-15
• Re: Releases
  From: Michael Terry, 2010-05-18
• Re: Releases
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-19
• Re: [Question #107216]: Public key encryption and incremental backups
  From: edso, 2010-05-07
• Re: [Question #107216]: Public key encryption and incremental backups
  From: edso, 2010-05-07
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #107216]: Public key encryption and incremental backups
  From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-05-07
• [Question #109976]: Is it possible to encrypt to both a private key and a passphrase
  From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-05-07
• Re: [Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
  From: edso, 2010-05-06
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-06
• Re: [Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
  From: edso, 2010-05-06
• Re: [Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
  From: Rodrigo Alvarez, 2010-05-06
• Re: [Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
  From: Rodrigo Alvarez, 2010-05-06
• Re: [Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
  From: mogliii, 2010-09-01
• Re: [Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
  From: mogliii, 2010-09-01
• [Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
  From: Rodrigo Alvarez, 2010-05-06

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status