← Back to team overview

duplicity-team team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the duplicity-team mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

200 of 6164 messages, page 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31

Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?, (continued)
- Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-09-20
- Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-09-21
- Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
  From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-09-22
[Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-07-04

Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-04

Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-07-05

Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-05
Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-05
Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-07-06
Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: edso, 2010-07-06
Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: edso, 2010-07-06
Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: edso, 2010-07-06
Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-06
Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-05

Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-07-06

Re: [Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: edso, 2010-07-06

<Possible follow-ups>
[Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-04
[Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-07-05
[Question #116587]: Can the "verify" option be used to ensure the entire backup could restore without error?
From: Peter Schuller, 2010-07-05

Re: [Question #115570]: Volume size: Pros and Cons of big Volumes?
From: Peter Schuller, 2010-06-23

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #115570]: Volume size: Pros and Cons of big Volumes?
From: Rodrigo Alvarez, 2010-06-23
Re: [Question #115570]: Volume size: Pros and Cons of big Volumes?
From: Rodrigo Alvarez, 2010-07-05

[Question #115570]: Volume size: Pros and Cons of big Volumes?
From: Rodrigo Alvarez, 2010-06-23
Re: [Question #115018]: Version interoperability.
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-06-18

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #115018]: Version interoperability.
From: dcaban, 2010-06-18
Re: [Question #115018]: Version interoperability.
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-06-18
Re: [Question #115018]: Version interoperability.
From: dcaban, 2010-06-18
Re: [Question #115018]: Version interoperability.
From: dcaban, 2010-06-18

[Question #115018]: Version interoperability.
From: dcaban, 2010-06-18
Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.7-series
From: rosetta, 2010-05-28

<Possible follow-ups>
Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.7-series
From: rosetta, 2010-07-22
Translation template import - duplicity in Duplicity 0.7-series
From: rosetta, 2010-08-26

Upgrade of Branches to 2a Format
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-27

Re: Upgrade of Branches to 2a Format
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-06-18

Re: [Question #109976]: Is it possible to encrypt to both a private key and a passphrase
From: Launchpad Janitor, 2010-05-22

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #109976]: Is it possible to encrypt to both a private key and a passphrase
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-22
Re: [Question #109976]: Is it possible to encrypt to both a private key and a passphrase
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-22

Re: [Question #111507]: Progress of something happening or better yet, time left
From: Andrew Fister, 2010-05-18

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #111507]: Progress of something happening or better yet, time left
From: someone1, 2010-05-18
Re: [Question #111507]: Progress of something happening or better yet, time left
From: someone1, 2010-05-19
Re: [Question #111507]: Progress of something happening or better yet, time left
From: hefee, 2010-08-16

[Question #111507]: Progress of something happening or better yet, time left
From: someone1, 2010-05-18

<Possible follow-ups>
[Question #111507]: Progress of something happening or better yet, time left
From: someone1, 2010-05-18

[Merge] lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-log-codes into lp:duplicity
From: Michael Terry, 2010-05-15

Re: [Merge] lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-log-codes into lp:duplicity
From: Michael Terry, 2010-05-15
Re: [Merge] lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-log-codes into lp:duplicity
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-24
Re: [Merge] lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-log-codes into lp:duplicity
From: Michael Terry, 2010-05-27

Re: [Merge] lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-log-codes into lp:duplicity
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-27

[Merge] lp:~mterry/duplicity/backend-log-codes into lp:duplicity
From: noreply, 2010-07-22

[Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
From: Olivier Berger, 2010-05-12

<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
From: Olivier Berger, 2010-05-12
[Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
From: Dirk Leinenbach, 2010-05-12
[Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
From: Olivier Berger, 2010-05-13
[Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
From: Olivier Berger, 2010-05-13
[Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-23
[Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-07-23
[Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-07-23
[Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-07-25
[Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
From: ben, 2012-07-16
[Bug 502609] Re: Unknown error while uploading duplicity-full-signatures
From: ben, 2012-07-16

Releases
From: Michael Terry, 2010-05-11

Re: Releases
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-15

Re: Releases
From: Michael Terry, 2010-05-18

Re: Releases
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-19

Re: [Question #107216]: Public key encryption and incremental backups
From: edso, 2010-05-07
Re: [Question #107216]: Public key encryption and incremental backups
From: edso, 2010-05-07

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #107216]: Public key encryption and incremental backups
From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-05-07

[Question #109976]: Is it possible to encrypt to both a private key and a passphrase
From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-05-07
Re: [Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
From: edso, 2010-05-06

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-05-06
Re: [Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
From: edso, 2010-05-06
Re: [Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
From: Rodrigo Alvarez, 2010-05-06
Re: [Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
From: Rodrigo Alvarez, 2010-05-06
Re: [Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
From: mogliii, 2010-09-01
Re: [Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
From: mogliii, 2010-09-01

[Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
From: Rodrigo Alvarez, 2010-05-06

<Possible follow-ups>
[Question #109951]: Errors don't go to logfile
From: Rodrigo Alvarez, 2010-05-06

Re: [Question #107074]: Local cache deleted after full S3 backup
From: Launchpad Janitor, 2010-04-27

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #107074]: Local cache deleted after full S3 backup
From: edso, 2010-04-27
Re: [Question #107074]: Local cache deleted after full S3 backup
From: edso, 2010-04-27
Re: [Question #107074]: Local cache deleted after full S3 backup
From: Launchpad Janitor, 2010-05-13
Re: [Question #107074]: Local cache deleted after full S3 backup
From: Job Snijders, 2010-05-14
Re: [Question #107074]: Local cache deleted after full S3 backup
From: Scott Donnelly, 2010-05-26
Re: [Question #107074]: Local cache deleted after full S3 backup
From: Scott Donnelly, 2010-05-26
Re: [Question #107074]: Local cache deleted after full S3 backup
From: Mig, 2010-12-02

Re: [Question #108413]: Suggestion, hash backup files to insure they are not corrupted
From: edso, 2010-04-26

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #108413]: Suggestion, hash backup files to insure they are not corrupted
From: Alex Robinson, 2010-04-26
Re: [Question #108413]: Suggestion, hash backup files to insure they are not corrupted
From: edso, 2010-04-26
Re: [Question #108413]: Suggestion, hash backup files to insure they are not corrupted
From: Alex Robinson, 2010-04-26

Re: [Question #108409]: how to avoid download of signature files
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-04-26

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #108409]: how to avoid download of signature files
From: Alex Robinson, 2010-04-26

[Question #108413]: Suggestion, hash backup files to insure they are not corrupted
From: Alex Robinson, 2010-04-26
[Question #108409]: how to avoid download of signature files
From: Alex Robinson, 2010-04-26
Re: [Question #107216]: Public key encryption and incremental backups
From: edso, 2010-04-13

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #107216]: Public key encryption and incremental backups
From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-05-06
Re: [Question #107216]: Public key encryption and incremental backups
From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2015-03-28

Re: [Question #107218]: Backing up to both an FTP site (regularly) and an external HDD (manually and occasionally)
From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-04-13

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #107218]: Backing up to both an FTP site (regularly) and an external HDD (manually and occasionally)
From: edso, 2010-04-13

[Question #107218]: Backing up to both an FTP site (regularly) and an external HDD (manually and occasionally)
From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-04-13
[Question #107216]: Public key encryption and incremental backups
From: Aaron Whitehouse, 2010-04-13
[Question #107074]: Local cache deleted after full S3 backup
From: Jock, 2010-04-11

<Possible follow-ups>
[Question #107074]: Local cache deleted after full S3 backup
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2011-01-01

Re: [Question #105539]: sftp failed error
From: Launchpad Janitor, 2010-04-10

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #105539]: sftp failed error
From: edso, 2010-04-10
Re: [Question #105539]: sftp failed error
From: Gabriele Tozzi, 2010-04-10
Re: [Question #105539]: sftp failed error
From: edso, 2010-04-10
Re: [Question #105539]: sftp failed error
From: Gabriele Tozzi, 2010-04-10
Re: [Question #105539]: sftp failed error
From: edso, 2010-04-10
Re: [Question #105539]: sftp failed error
From: mfn, 2011-02-11

[Question #105539]: sftp failed error
From: Gabriele Tozzi, 2010-03-25
Re: [Question #103229]: Wouldn't it make sense to output a full signature in `rdiffdir --write-sig-to <sig> delta'?
From: Launchpad Janitor, 2010-03-20

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #103229]: Wouldn't it make sense to output a full signature in `rdiffdir --write-sig-to <sig> delta'?
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-03-20
Re: [Question #103229]: Wouldn't it make sense to output a full signature in `rdiffdir --write-sig-to <sig> delta'?
From: Launchpad Janitor, 2010-04-05
Re: [Question #103229]: Wouldn't it make sense to output a full signature in `rdiffdir --write-sig-to <sig> delta'?
From: Laszlo Ersek, 2012-12-21
Re: [Question #103229]: Wouldn't it make sense to output a full signature in `rdiffdir --write-sig-to <sig> delta'?
From: Laszlo Ersek, 2012-12-31

Re: [Question #104121]: Error an hour thru backup relating to duplicity/diffdir.py
From: Kevin Smith, 2010-03-13

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #104121]: Error an hour thru backup relating to duplicity/diffdir.py
From: Kevin Smith, 2010-03-13
Re: [Question #104121]: Error an hour thru backup relating to duplicity/diffdir.py
From: Guilherme Salgado, 2010-11-04

[Question #104121]: Error an hour thru backup relating to duplicity/diffdir.py
From: Kevin Smith, 2010-03-12
Re: [Question #103950]: AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'gpg_options'
From: Michael Terry, 2010-03-11

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #103950]: AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'gpg_options'
From: Eelco Dolstra, 2010-03-11
Re: [Question #103950]: AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'gpg_options'
From: pkaeding, 2010-03-12
Re: [Question #103950]: AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'gpg_options'
From: pkaeding, 2010-03-12

Bug with latest 0.6.07-0ubuntu0karmic1 (Ubuntu Karmic)
From: Andrea Gelmini, 2010-03-09

Re: Bug with latest 0.6.07-0ubuntu0karmic1 (Ubuntu Karmic)
From: Michael Terry, 2010-03-09

Re: Bug with latest 0.6.07-0ubuntu0karmic1 (Ubuntu Karmic)
From: Andrea Gelmini, 2010-03-09

Re: Bug with latest 0.6.07-0ubuntu0karmic1 (Ubuntu Karmic)
From: Michael Terry, 2010-03-09

0.6-series looks good to me
From: Michael Terry, 2010-02-25
0.6.07
From: Michael Terry, 2010-01-16

Re: 0.6.07
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2010-01-16

Restore file system
From: Anna **, 2009-10-22

Re: Restore file system
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-10-23

Listing old files
From: Michael Terry, 2009-10-12

Re: Listing old files
From: edgar . soldin, 2009-10-19

Re: Listing old files
From: Michael Terry, 2009-10-20

Re: Listing old files
From: edgar . soldin, 2009-10-20
Re: Listing old files
From: edgar . soldin, 2009-10-20
Re: Listing old files
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-10-20
Re: Listing old files
From: edgar . soldin, 2009-10-20
Re: Listing old files
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-10-20
Re: Listing old files
From: edgar . soldin, 2009-10-20
Re: Listing old files
From: Michael Terry, 2009-10-22
Re: Listing old files
From: edgar . soldin, 2009-10-22
Re: Listing old files
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-10-22
Re: Listing old files
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-10-22
Re: Listing old files
From: Michael Terry, 2009-10-22
Re: Listing old files
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-10-22
Re: Listing old files
From: Michael Terry, 2009-10-22
Re: Listing old files
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-10-22
Re: Listing old files
From: Michael Terry, 2009-10-23
Re: Listing old files
From: Michael Terry, 2009-10-29
Re: Listing old files
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-10-29
Re: Listing old files
From: Michael Terry, 2009-10-29

Installation Instructions for Duplicity on Mac OS X
From: Rob Oakes, 2009-10-07
Coalescing of Incremental Backups/Snapshots
From: Rob Oakes, 2009-09-26

Re: Coalescing of Incremental Backups/Snapshots
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-09-30

Re: Coalescing of Incremental Backups/Snapshots
From: Rob Oakes, 2009-09-30

Confusion over "stable" label
From: Larry Gilbert, 2009-09-23

Re: Confusion over "stable" label
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-09-23

Re: Confusion over "stable" label
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-09-24

ede is listening
From: edgar . soldin, 2009-09-17
Python API
From: Michael Terry, 2009-09-17

Re: Python API
From: edgar . soldin, 2009-09-17
Re: Python API
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-09-18

Re: Python API
From: edgar . soldin, 2009-09-19

Re: Python API
From: Rob Oakes, 2009-09-26

[Bug 426282] Re: [PATCH] par2 creating support
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-09-17

<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 426282] Re: [PATCH] par2 creating support
From: Larry Gilbert, 2009-09-17
[Bug 426282] Re: [PATCH] par2 creating support
From: Larry Gilbert, 2009-09-17
[Bug 426282] Re: [PATCH] par2 creating support
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-09-18
[Bug 426282] Re: [PATCH] par2 creating support
From: Stéphane Lesimple, 2009-10-05
[Bug 426282] Re: [PATCH] par2 creating support
From: Stéphane Lesimple, 2009-10-05
[Bug 426282] Re: [PATCH] par2 creating support
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-10-06
[Bug 426282] Re: [PATCH] par2 creating support
From: Stéphane Lesimple, 2009-10-06
[Bug 426282] Re: [PATCH] par2 creating support
From: Plamen K. Kosseff, 2009-10-07
[Bug 426282] Re: [PATCH] par2 creating support
From: Plamen K. Kosseff, 2009-10-07
[Bug 426282] Re: [PATCH] par2 creating support
From: gwern, 2011-06-04

Re: [Bug 426282] Re: [PATCH] par2 creating support
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2011-06-07

[Bug 426282] Re: [PATCH] par2 creating support
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2011-06-12

[Bug 426282] [NEW] [PATCH] par2 creating support
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2009-09-17
Re: Auto Coalescing Incremental Backups
From: Larry Gilbert, 2009-09-14
xar: suitable successor to tar?
From: Larry Gilbert, 2009-09-11
Differential backups (Re: Auto Coalescing Incremental Backups)
From: Larry Gilbert, 2009-09-11

Re: Differential backups (Re: Auto Coalescing Incremental Backups)
From: Plamen Kosseff, 2009-09-11

Re: Differential backups (Re: Auto Coalescing Incremental Backups)
From: Larry Gilbert, 2009-09-11

Re: Differential backups (Re: Auto Coalescing Incremental Backups)
From: Rob Oakes, 2009-09-13

Auto Coalescing Incremental Backups
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-09-11

Message not available
- Fwd: Auto Coalescing Incremental Backups
  From: Plamen Kosseff, 2009-09-11
Message not available
- Re: Auto Coalescing Incremental Backups
  From: Larry Gilbert, 2009-09-11

Some Reorg of code.launchpad.net/duplicity
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-09-07

Re: Some Reorg of code.launchpad.net/duplicity
From: Michael Terry, 2009-09-17
<Possible follow-ups>
Some Reorg of code.launchpad.net/duplicity
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-09-07

Re: Some Reorg of code.launchpad.net/duplicity
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-09-07

Trunk (0.6.05) and Stable (0.5.20) Need Review
From: Kenneth Loafman, 2009-08-25

200 of 6164 messages, page 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31