yade-users team mailing list archive

1. yade-users team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the yade-users mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• Re: [Question #677261]: Simulation speed on Vmware, (continued)
  • Re: [Question #677261]: Simulation speed on Vmware
    From: Robert Caulk, 2019-01-03
  • Re: [Question #677261]: Simulation speed on Vmware
    From: fengjingyu, 2019-01-03
  • Re: [Question #677261]: Simulation speed on Vmware
    From: Robert Caulk, 2019-01-03
  • Re: [Question #677261]: Simulation speed on Vmware
    From: fengjingyu, 2019-01-04
• [Question #677261]: Simulation speed on Vmware
  From: fengjingyu, 2019-01-02
• Re: [Question #677006]: different type of interactions
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2019-01-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #677006]: different type of interactions
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-01-18
• Re: [Question #677194]: Unstable clump
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2019-01-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #677194]: Unstable clump
  From: SayedHessam, 2019-01-14
• Re: [Question #677194]: Unstable clump
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-01-18
• Re: [Question #677237]: getStress() applies for clumps?
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2019-01-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #677237]: getStress() applies for clumps?
  From: xuelong14, 2019-01-03
• Re: [Question #677237]: getStress() applies for clumps?
  From: xuelong14, 2019-01-03
• [Question #677237]: getStress() applies for clumps?
  From: xuelong14, 2018-12-31
• Re: [Question #677215]: problem with installation YADE package
  From: Manfred Hampl, 2018-12-29
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #677215]: problem with installation YADE package
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-29
• Re: [Question #677215]: problem with installation YADE package
  From: Mahdeyeh, 2018-12-31
• [Question #677215]: problem with installation YADE package
  From: Mahdeyeh, 2018-12-29
• [Question #677194]: Unstable clump
  From: SayedHessam, 2018-12-28
• Re: [Question #677084]: manipulate the spheres during running
  From: gaoxuesong, 2018-12-27
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #677084]: manipulate the spheres during running
  From: Chareyre, 2018-12-27
• Re: [Question #677084]: manipulate the spheres during running
  From: gaoxuesong, 2018-12-27
• Re: [Question #677084]: manipulate the spheres during running
  From: Chareyre, 2018-12-28
• [Question #677084]: manipulate the spheres during running
  From: gaoxuesong, 2018-12-27
• [Question #677006]: different type of interactions
  From: Cloud, 2018-12-24
• Re: [Question #676980]: PeriTriaxController control
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-22
• [Question #676980]: PeriTriaxController control
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-22
• [Question #676953]: Append a grid to an existing grid during a running simulation
  From: Luc Sibille, 2018-12-20
• Re: [Question #676874]: Brazilian Tensile Test
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676874]: Brazilian Tensile Test
  From: ozge, 2018-12-18
• [Question #676874]: Brazilian Tensile Test
  From: ozge, 2018-12-18
• Re: [Question #676855]: Dose Liboofem lack druckerPrager module?
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-17
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676855]: Dose Liboofem lack druckerPrager module?
  From: De zhang, 2018-12-18
• [Question #676855]: Dose Liboofem lack druckerPrager module?
  From: De zhang, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676854]: problems of multiscale coupling of DEM-FEM
  From: zhou qian, 2018-12-17
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676854]: problems of multiscale coupling of DEM-FEM
  From: Robert Caulk, 2018-12-18
• [Question #676854]: problems of multiscale coupling of DEM-FEM
  From: zhou qian, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676845]: 'instancemethod' object has no attribute '__getitem__'
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-17
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676845]: 'instancemethod' object has no attribute '__getitem__'
  From: Mehrad, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676845]: 'instancemethod' object has no attribute '__getitem__'
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676845]: 'instancemethod' object has no attribute '__getitem__'
  From: Mehrad, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676845]: 'instancemethod' object has no attribute '__getitem__'
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676845]: 'instancemethod' object has no attribute '__getitem__'
  From: Mehrad, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676845]: 'instancemethod' object has no attribute '__getitem__'
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-18
• Re: [Question #676845]: 'instancemethod' object has no attribute '__getitem__'
  From: Mehrad, 2018-12-25
• Re: [Question #676845]: 'instancemethod' object has no attribute '__getitem__'
  From: Jan Stránský, 2019-01-02
• Re: [Question #676845]: 'instancemethod' object has no attribute '__getitem__'
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-01-10
• [Question #676845]: 'instancemethod' object has no attribute '__getitem__'
  From: Mehrad, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676664]: plot the stress and strain
  From: Mehrad, 2018-12-17
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676664]: plot the stress and strain
  From: Luc Scholtès, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676831]: control the porosity
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-17
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676831]: control the porosity
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676831]: control the porosity
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676831]: control the porosity
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-22
• Re: [Question #676831]: control the porosity
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-22
• Re: [Question #676831]: control the porosity
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2019-01-02
• Re: [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-17
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-19
• Re: [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-22
• Re: [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-22
• Re: [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity
  From: Ferenc Safranyik, 2020-11-14
• Re: [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity
  From: Luc Scholtès, 2020-11-14
• Re: [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity
  From: Ferenc Safranyik, 2020-11-14
• Re: [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity
  From: Luc Scholtès, 2020-11-15
• Re: [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2020-11-23
• Re: [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity
  From: Ferenc Safranyik, 2020-11-24
• [Question #676841]: the definition of porosity
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-17
• [Question #676831]: control the porosity
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-16
• Re: [Question #676830]: maxStrainRate in the PeriTriaxController
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676830]: maxStrainRate in the PeriTriaxController
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676830]: maxStrainRate in the PeriTriaxController
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-17
• [Question #676830]: maxStrainRate in the PeriTriaxController
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-16
• Re: [Question #676810]: angle of shearing resistance in triaxial compression
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-15
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676810]: angle of shearing resistance in triaxial compression
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-17
• Re: [Question #676810]: obtain angle of shearing resistance
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-15
• Re: [Question #676810]: obtain shearing resistance
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-15
• [Question #676810]: obtain shearing resistance
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-15
• Re: [Question #676776]: plot psd
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-15
• Re: [Question #676776]: obtain shearing resistance
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-15
• Re: [Question #676781]: Yadedaily version
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-13
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676781]: Yadedaily version
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-13
• [Question #676781]: Yadedaily version
  From: Luis Barbosa, 2018-12-13
• Re: [Question #676747]: the way of set psd
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-13
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676747]: the way of set psd
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-13
• Re: [Question #676747]: the way of set psd
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2018-12-13
• Re: [Question #676747]: the way of set psd
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-13
• Re: [Question #676747]: the way of set psd
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-14
• Re: [Question #676747]: the way of set psd
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-14
• Re: [Question #676776]: how to plot psd
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-13
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676776]: how to plot psd
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-13
• Re: [Question #676776]: how to plot psd
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-13
• Re: [Question #676776]: how to plot psd
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-13
• Re: [Question #676776]: how to plot psd
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-13
• Re: [Question #676776]: how to plot psd
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-13
• Re: [Question #676776]: how to plot psd
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-14
• Re: [Question #676776]: how to plot psd
  From: Robert Caulk, 2018-12-14
• [Question #676776]: how to plot psd
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-13
• Re: [Question #676748]: fixed=True how it is iworking?
  From: Robert Caulk, 2018-12-12
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676748]: fixed=True how it is iworking?
  From: Luc OGER, 2018-12-12
• Re: [Question #676748]: fixed=True how it is iworking?
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-12
• Re: [Question #676746]: JCFpmState Error
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-11
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676746]: JCFpmState Error
  From: mohsen, 2018-12-12
• Re: [Question #676746]: JCFpmState Error
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-12
• Re: [Question #676746]: JCFpmState Error
  From: mohsen, 2018-12-12
• Re: [Question #676746]: JCFpmState Error
  From: mohsen, 2018-12-16
• Re: [Question #676746]: JCFpmState Error
  From: Chareyre, 2018-12-16
• Re: [Question #676746]: JCFpmState Error
  From: mohsen, 2018-12-23
• Re: [Question #676746]: JCFpmState Error
  From: Chareyre, 2018-12-23
• [Question #676748]: fixed=True how it is iworking?
  From: Luc OGER, 2018-12-11
• [Question #676747]: the way of set psd
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-11
• [Question #676746]: JCFpmState Error
  From: mohsen, 2018-12-11
• Re: [Question #676713]: calculate particle number
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-09
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676713]: calculate particle number
  From: Robert Caulk, 2018-12-12
• [Question #676713]: calculate particle number
  From: fengjingyu, 2018-12-09
• Re: [Question #676682]: Starting to learn YADE and example code for creating polygon particle in assembly?
  From: Robert Caulk, 2018-12-08
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676682]: Starting to learn YADE and example code for creating polygon particle in assembly?
  From: Mahdeyeh, 2018-12-11
• Re: [Question #676682]: Starting to learn YADE and example code for creating polygon particle in assembly?
  From: pamelaward, 2021-05-12
• Re: [Question #676672]: list index out of range for plot.saveDataTxt ?
  From: Robert Caulk, 2018-12-08
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676672]: list index out of range for plot.saveDataTxt ?
  From: Luc OGER, 2018-12-10
• [Question #676682]: Starting to learn YADE and example code for creating polygon particle in assembly?
  From: Mahdeyeh, 2018-12-08
• [Question #676672]: list index out of range for plot.saveDataTxt ?
  From: Luc OGER, 2018-12-07
• Re: [Question #676664]: plot the stress and strein
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2018-12-07
• [Question #676664]: plot the stress and strein
  From: Mehrad, 2018-12-07
• Re: [Question #676639]: Perform UCS-TS test
  From: Luc Scholtès, 2018-12-06
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676639]: Perform UCS-TS test
  From: kalogeropoulos, 2018-12-07
• Re: [Question #676639]: Perform UCS-TS test
  From: kalogeropoulos, 2018-12-07
• [Question #676639]: Perform UCS-TS test
  From: kalogeropoulos, 2018-12-06
• Re: [Question #676621]: problems of surface coupling of DEM-FEM
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-05
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676621]: problems of surface coupling of DEM-FEM
  From: De zhang, 2018-12-06
• Re: [Question #676621]: problems of surface coupling of DEM-FEM
  From: De zhang, 2018-12-06
• [Question #676621]: problems of surface coupling of DEM-FEM
  From: De zhang, 2018-12-05
• yadedaily packages are updated again / ubuntu 18.04 available
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-05
• Re: [Question #676609]: problem with createInteraction() command
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2018-12-05
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676609]: problem with createInteraction() command
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-05
• Re: [Question #676609]: problem with createInteraction() command
  From: Son Pham Thai, 2018-12-05
• Re: [Question #676609]: problem with createInteraction() command
  From: Son Pham Thai, 2018-12-05
• Re: [Question #676609]: problem with createInteraction() command
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-05
• Re: [Question #676609]: problem with createInteraction() command
  From: Son Pham Thai, 2018-12-06
• [Question #676609]: problem with createInteraction() command
  From: Son Pham Thai, 2018-12-05
• Re: [Question #676507]: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE
  From: Mahdeyeh, 2018-12-03
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676507]: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE
  From: Robert Caulk, 2018-12-03
• Re: [Question #676507]: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-03
• Re: [Question #676507]: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE
  From: Mahdeyeh, 2018-12-03
• Re: [Question #676507]: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-03
• Re: [Question #676507]: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE
  From: Mahdeyeh, 2018-12-03
• Re: [Question #676507]: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-12-03
• Re: [Question #676507]: capability of simulating angular rigid particles (polyhedral) with YADE
  From: Mahdeyeh, 2018-12-05
• Re: [Question #676528]: Experimental behaviour is different from simulated one
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676528]: Experimental behaviour is different from simulated one
  From: Luca Strobino, 2018-12-03
• Re: [Question #676528]: Experimental behaviour is different from simulated one
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-12-03
• Re: [Question #676528]: Experimental behaviour is different from simulated one
  From: Luca Strobino, 2018-12-03
• Re: [Question #676528]: Experimental behaviour is different from simulated one
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2018-12-19
• [Question #676528]: Experimental behaviour is different from simulated one
  From: Luca Strobino, 2018-12-02
• Re: [Question #676507]: what are the differences of YADE with PFC version 6 in simulating?
  From: Mahdeyeh, 2018-12-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676507]: what are the differences of YADE with PFC version 6 in simulating?
  From: Robert Caulk, 2018-12-02
• Re: [Question #676507]: what are the differences of YADE with PFC version 6 in simulating?
  From: Robert Caulk, 2018-12-02
• Re: [Question #676507]: what are the differences of YADE with PFC version 6 in simulating?
  From: Mahdeyeh, 2018-12-02
• Re: [Question #676507]: what are the differences of YADE with PFC version 6 in simulating?
  From: Mahdeyeh, 2018-12-03
• Re: [Question #676507]: what are the differences of YADE with PFC version 6 in simulating?
  From: Robert Caulk, 2018-12-03
• Re: [Question #676507]: what are the differences of YADE with PFC version 6 in simulating?
  From: Mahdeyeh, 2018-12-05
• [Question #676507]: what are the differences of YADE with PFC version 6 in simulating?
  From: Mahdeyeh, 2018-12-01
• Re: [Question #676452]: yadedaily update
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-11-29
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676452]: yadedaily update
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676452]: yadedaily update
  From: Luis Barbosa, 2018-11-29
• [Question #676452]: yadedaily update
  From: Luis Barbosa, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Robert Caulk, 2018-11-29
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Andrea Plati, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Andrea Plati, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Andrea Plati, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Andrea Plati, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-11-30
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Andrea Plati, 2018-11-30
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-11-30
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Andrea Plati, 2018-12-05
• Re: [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2018-12-21
• Re: [Question #676450]: Uploading simulation files to Amazon HPC
  From: Robert Caulk, 2018-11-29
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676450]: Uploading simulation files to Amazon HPC
  From: KJ Chuah, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676450]: Uploading simulation files to Amazon HPC
  From: Robert Caulk, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676450]: Uploading simulation files to Amazon HPC
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676450]: Uploading simulation files to Amazon HPC
  From: KJ Chuah, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676450]: Uploading simulation files to Amazon HPC
  From: Robert Caulk, 2018-11-30
• Re: [Question #676450]: Uploading simulation files to Amazon HPC
  From: KJ Chuah, 2018-12-01
• Re: [Question #676450]: Uploading simulation files to Amazon HPC
  From: KJ Chuah, 2018-12-01
• Re: [Question #676450]: Uploading simulation files to Amazon HPC
  From: Robert Caulk, 2018-12-01
• [Question #676451]: optimize camputational time for vibrated granular media
  From: Andrea Plati, 2018-11-29
• [Question #676450]: Uploading simulation files to Amazon HPC
  From: KJ Chuah, 2018-11-29
• Re: [Question #676382]: Engine Error (JCFpmMat)
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-11-28
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #676382]: Engine Error (JCFpmMat)
  From: SayedHessam, 2018-11-28
• Re: [Question #676382]: Engine Error (JCFpmMat)
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-11-28
• Re: [Question #676382]: Engine Error (JCFpmMat)
  From: Jan Stránský, 2018-11-28
• Re: [Question #676382]: Engine Error (JCFpmMat)
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2018-11-30

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status