← Back to team overview

rohc team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

rohc team
Mailing list archive
Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the rohc mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

200 of 2374 messages, page 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12

Re: android compilation, (continued)
Re: [Question #232097]: TCP
From: regulararmy, 2013-07-09

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #232097]: TCP
From: regulararmy, 2013-07-09
Re: [Question #232097]: TCP
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-07-09
Re: [Question #232097]: TCP
From: regulararmy, 2013-07-10
Re: [Question #232097]: TCP
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-07-10
Re: [Question #232097]: TCP
From: regulararmy, 2013-07-10

[Question #232097]: TCP
From: regulararmy, 2013-07-09
TCP profile merged in main dev branch
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-07-07

Re: TCP profile merged in main dev branch
From: Cédric Baudoin, 2013-07-07

account creation disabled on wiki
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-30
Re: [Question #231116]: no ping with remote server
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-25

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #231116]: no ping with remote server
From: said lokhat, 2013-06-27
Re: [Question #231116]: no ping with remote server
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-30
Re: [Question #231116]: no ping with remote server
From: said lokhat, 2013-07-03
Re: [Question #231116]: no ping with remote server
From: robert kessler, 2014-04-08

Re: [Question #231360]: rohc implementation for wimax
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-25

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #231360]: rohc implementation for wimax
From: Launchpad Janitor, 2013-07-11

[Question #231360]: rohc implementation for wimax
From: manish shivare, 2013-06-25
[Question #231359]: rohc integration in ns2
From: manish shivare, 2013-06-25
Re: [Question #231316]: about feedback
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-25

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #231316]: about feedback
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-25
Re: [Question #231316]: about feedback
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-26
Re: [Question #231316]: about feedback
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-26
Re: [Question #231316]: about feedback
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-26
Re: [Question #231316]: about feedback
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-27

[Question #231316]: about feedback
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-25
[Question #231116]: no ping with remote server
From: said lokhat, 2013-06-21
Re: [Question #230938]: size smaller
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-19

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #230938]: size smaller
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-19
Re: [Question #230938]: size smaller
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-26

[Question #230938]: size smaller
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-18
Re: [Question #230685]: is it a bug?
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-13

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #230685]: is it a bug?
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-13
Re: [Question #230685]: is it a bug?
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-14
Re: [Question #230685]: is it a bug?
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-15
Re: [Question #230685]: is it a bug?
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-17

[Question #230685]: is it a bug?
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-13
Major version 1.6.0 is available!
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-09

Re: Major version 1.6.0 is available!
From: Audric Schiltknecht, 2013-06-13

Re: Major version 1.6.0 is available!
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-13

Maintenance versions 1.3.5, 1.4.3, and 1.5.2 are available!
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-09
[Question #212269]: Status of bug #1071413 changed to 'Fix Released' in trunk
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-09
[Question #216331]: Status of bug #1096586 changed to 'Fix Released' in trunk
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-09
[Question #165269]: Status of bug #813128 changed to 'Fix Released' in trunk
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-09
[Question #180689]: Status of bug #813128 changed to 'Fix Released' in trunk
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-09
[Question #228535]: Status of bug #1178441 changed to 'Fix Released' in trunk
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-09
Re: [Question #230409]: Return Value
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-08

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #230409]: Return Value
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-09

[Question #230409]: Return Value
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-08
Re: [Question #230301]: cid_type
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-06

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #230301]: cid_type
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-08
Re: [Question #230301]: cid_type
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-17
Re: [Question #230301]: cid_type
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-17
Re: [Question #230301]: cid_type
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-18
Re: [Question #230301]: cid_type
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-19
Re: [Question #230301]: cid_type
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-19
Re: [Question #230301]: cid_type
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-25
Re: [Question #230301]: cid_type
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-26

[Question #230301]: cid_type
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-06
Re: [Question #230218]: compressed header size
From: Friedrich, 2013-06-05

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #230218]: compressed header size
From: Friedrich, 2013-06-05
Re: [Question #230218]: compressed header size
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-05
Re: [Question #230218]: compressed header size
From: Friedrich, 2013-06-05

[Question #230218]: compressed header size
From: Friedrich, 2013-06-05
Re: [Question #230140]: some questions
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-04

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #230140]: some questions
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-05
Re: [Question #230140]: some questions
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-05
Re: [Question #230140]: some questions
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-05
Re: [Question #230140]: some questions
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-05
Re: [Question #230140]: some questions
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-06
Re: [Question #230140]: some questions
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-06
Re: [Question #230140]: some questions
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-06
Re: [Question #230140]: some questions
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-06
Re: [Question #230140]: some questions
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-08

[Question #230140]: some questions
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-04
What is the best practice for RTP packet send with rohc?
From: Yuming Zheng, 2013-06-03

Re: What is the best practice for RTP packet send with rohc?
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-03

tun2udp
From: 宋鑫, 2013-06-01

Re: tun2udp
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-01

Re: tun2udp
From: 宋鑫, 2013-06-03

Re: tun2udp
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-03
Re: tun2udp
From: 宋鑫, 2013-06-03
Re: tun2udp
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-03
Re: tun2udp
From: 宋鑫, 2013-06-13
Re: tun2udp
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-13
Re: tun2udp
From: 宋鑫, 2013-06-14
Re: tun2udp
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-15
Re: tun2udp
From: 宋鑫, 2013-06-17
Re: tun2udp
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-17

Re: [Question #229838]: profile0x0000
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-30

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #229838]: profile0x0000
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-04

Re: [Question #229904]: how to download rohc branch with bazzaar?
From: Atik, 2013-05-30

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #229904]: how to download rohc branch with bazzaar?
From: Atik, 2013-05-30
Re: [Question #229904]: how to download rohc branch with bazzaar?
From: Audric Schiltknecht, 2013-05-30
Re: [Question #229904]: how to download rohc branch with bazzaar?
From: Gregory G, 2013-05-31

[Question #229904]: how to download rohc branch with bazzaar?
From: Gregory G, 2013-05-30
[Question #229838]: profile0x0000
From: regulararmy, 2013-05-29
Re: [Question #229518]: about feedback (2)
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-24

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #229518]: about feedback (2)
From: Friedrich, 2013-06-03
Re: [Question #229518]: about feedback (2)
From: Friedrich, 2013-06-03
Re: [Question #229518]: about feedback (2)
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-03
Re: [Question #229518]: about feedback (2)
From: Friedrich, 2013-06-10
Re: [Question #229518]: about feedback (2)
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-12
Re: [Question #229518]: about feedback (2)
From: Friedrich, 2013-07-25

[Question #229518]: about feedback (2)
From: Friedrich, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229506]: RTP in 1.5.2
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-23

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #229506]: RTP in 1.5.2
From: Friedrich, 2013-05-23

[Question #229506]: RTP in 1.5.2
From: Friedrich, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229409]: How to know flow of packet after be compressed
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-23

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #229409]: How to know flow of packet after be compressed
From: Atik, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229409]: How to know flow of packet after be compressed
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-23

Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-23

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Friedrich, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Friedrich, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-24
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-24
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-24
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-24
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-25
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-28
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-28
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-28
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-28
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-28
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-28
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-28
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-28
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-29
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-29
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-29
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-29
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-30
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-31
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-01
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-06-03
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-03
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-06-03
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-03
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-06-04
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-04
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-06-04
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-06-07
Re: [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-07

Re: [Question #229448]: about feedback
From: regulararmy, 2013-05-23

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #229448]: about feedback
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229448]: about feedback
From: Friedrich, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229448]: about feedback
From: regulararmy, 2013-05-24
Re: [Question #229448]: about feedback
From: regulararmy, 2013-05-29
Re: [Question #229448]: about feedback
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-29
Re: [Question #229448]: about feedback
From: regulararmy, 2013-05-29
Re: [Question #229448]: about feedback
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-30
Re: [Question #229448]: about feedback
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-03
Re: [Question #229448]: about feedback
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-03
Re: [Question #229448]: about feedback
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-03
Re: [Question #229448]: about feedback
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-04
Re: [Question #229448]: about feedback
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-04
Re: [Question #229448]: about feedback
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-06-04
Re: [Question #229448]: about feedback
From: regulararmy, 2013-06-05

[Question #229448]: about feedback
From: regulararmy, 2013-05-23
[Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression
From: Wei Wang, 2013-05-22
[Question #229409]: How to know flow of packet after be compressed
From: nguyen trong cuong, 2013-05-22
Window size in W-LSB encoding
From: faraz iqbal, 2013-05-22

Re: Window size in W-LSB encoding
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-23

Re: [Question #229367]: three parameters
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-22

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #229367]: three parameters
From: regulararmy, 2013-05-22
Re: [Question #229367]: three parameters
From: regulararmy, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229367]: three parameters
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-23
Re: [Question #229367]: three parameters
From: regulararmy, 2013-05-24

[Question #229367]: three parameters
From: regulararmy, 2013-05-22
[Question #216331]: Status of bug #1096586 changed to 'Fix Released' in 1.5.x
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-20
[Question #228535]: Status of bug #1178441 changed to 'Fix Released' in 1.5.x
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-20
[Question #228952]: Status of bug #1180480 changed to 'Fix Committed' in iprohc
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-18
[Question #228952]: Status of bug #1180480 changed to 'Fix Committed' in rohc
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-18
[Question #228952]: Status of bug #1180480 changed to 'Confirmed' in iprohc
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-18
[Question #228952]: Status of bug #1180480 changed to 'Incomplete' in iprohc
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-15
Re: [Question #228952]: I can reliably crash iprohc client
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-15

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #228952]: I can reliably crash iprohc client
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-15
Re: [Question #228952]: I can reliably crash iprohc client
From: matthew, 2013-05-15
Re: [Question #228952]: I can reliably crash iprohc client
From: matthew, 2013-05-15
Re: [Question #228952]: I can reliably crash iprohc client
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-18
Re: [Question #228952]: I can reliably crash iprohc client
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-20

[Question #228952]: I can reliably crash iprohc client
From: matthew, 2013-05-15
Re: [Question #228845]: interactive process tests
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-14

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #228845]: interactive process tests
From: regulararmy, 2013-05-15
Re: [Question #228845]: interactive process tests
From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-05-15

200 of 2374 messages, page 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12