rohc team mailing list archive

1. rohc team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the rohc mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• Re: PKGBUILD for Archlinux, (continued)
  • Re: PKGBUILD for Archlinux
    From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-09-03
  • Re: PKGBUILD for Archlinux
    From: Audric Schiltknecht, 2012-09-03
  • Re: PKGBUILD for Archlinux
    From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-09-04
• Re: [Question #204833]: is any rohc with TCP profile support avaiable for download?
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2012-08-19
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #204833]: is any rohc with TCP profile support avaiable for download?
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-08-20
• Re: [Question #204833]: is any rohc with TCP profile support avaiable for download?
  From: saadan ansari, 2012-08-30
• Re: [Question #204833]: is any rohc with TCP profile support avaiable for download?
  From: RoHC Team, 2012-08-30
• Re: [Question #204833]: is any rohc with TCP profile support avaiable for download?
  From: FWX, 2012-10-23
• Re: [Question #204833]: is any rohc with TCP profile support avaiable for download?
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-10-23
• Re: [Question #204833]: is any rohc with TCP profile support avaiable for download?
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-08-30
• Re: [Question #204833]: is any rohc with TCP profile support avaiable for download?
  From: FWX, 2012-08-30
• Re: TCP Profile
  From: RoHC Team, 2012-08-13
• Re: TCP Profile
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-08-13
• [Question #204833]: is any rohc with TCP profile support avaiable for download?
  From: saadan ansari, 2012-08-02
• Re: [Question #204833]: is any rohc with TCP profile support avaiable for download?
  From: RoHC Team, 2012-08-03
• Wiki now available!
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-07-14
• ROHC library 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 released
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-07-14
• Re: RoHC support for TCP header (RFC: 4996)
  From: Farhaj Ahsan, 2012-07-10
• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Re: RoHC support for TCP header (RFC: 4996)
      From: RoHC Team, 2012-07-10
• Re: RoHC support for TCP header (RFC: 4996)
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-07-10
• Message not available
  • Re: RoHC support for TCP header (RFC: 4996)
    From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-07-10
  • Re: RoHC support for TCP header (RFC: 4996)
    From: Farhaj Ahsan, 2012-07-10
  • Re: RoHC support for TCP header (RFC: 4996)
    From: Farhaj Ahsan, 2012-07-10
  • Re: RoHC support for TCP header (RFC: 4996)
    From: Farhaj Ahsan, 2012-07-19
  • Re: RoHC support for TCP header (RFC: 4996)
    From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-07-20
• Inter-library dependencies
  From: Mikhail Gruzdev, 2012-06-28
• Re: Inter-library dependencies
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-06-28
• Re: [Question #201484]: In what situation will the rand change when decompressing
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-06-26
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #201484]: In what situation will the rand change when decompressing
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-06-28
• Re: [Question #201484]: In what situation will the rand change when decompressing
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-06-28
• Re: [Question #201484]: In what situation will the rand change when decompressing
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-06-29
• Re: [Question #201484]: In what situation will the rand change when decompressing
  From: Sankar Malladi, 2013-01-18
• Re: [Question #201484]: In what situation will the rand change when decompressing
  From: Sankar Malladi, 2013-01-18
• Re: [Question #201484]: In what situation will the rand change when decompressing
  From: Sankar Malladi, 2013-01-18
• Re: [Question #201484]: In what situation will the rand change when decompressing
  From: Sankar Malladi, 2013-01-18
• Re: [Question #201484]: In what situation will the rand change when decompressing
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-01-20
• [Question #201484]: In what situation will the rand change when decompressing
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-06-26
• useless ceil() calls
  From: Mikhail Gruzdev, 2012-06-19
• Re: useless ceil() calls
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-06-19
• Re: useless ceil() calls
  From: Mikhail Gruzdev, 2012-07-09
• Re: useless ceil() calls
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-07-10
• Re: useless ceil() calls
  From: Mikhail Gruzdev, 2012-07-11
• Re: useless ceil() calls
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-07-11
• Re: useless ceil() calls
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-07-12
• Optimisation: less strlen() calls
  From: RoHC Team, 2012-06-13
• Re: Optimisation: less strlen() calls
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-06-14
• [Question #199288]: how could we get id_ref when decoding uor-2-ts packet with extension 3
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-06-04
• Re: [Question #199288]: how could we get id_ref when decoding uor-2-ts packet with extension 3
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-06-04
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #199288]: how could we get id_ref when decoding uor-2-ts packet with extension 3
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-06-10
• Re: [Question #199288]: how could we get id_ref when decoding uor-2-ts packet with extension 3
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-06-12
• Re: [Question #198879]: when to use extension
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-30
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #198879]: when to use extension
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-05-31
• [Question #198879]: when to use extension
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-05-30
• Support of RFC4996 RoHC-TCP
  From: RoHC Team, 2012-05-20
• Re: Support of RFC4996 RoHC-TCP
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-10-21
• Re: Support of RFC4996 RoHC-TCP
  From: RoHC Team, 2012-10-22
• Re: Support of RFC4996 RoHC-TCP
  From: RoHC Team, 2012-10-22
• Re: Support of RFC4996 RoHC-TCP
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-10-22
• Re: Support of RFC4996 RoHC-TCP
  From: RoHC Team, 2012-10-22
• Re: Support of RFC4996 RoHC-TCP
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-10-22
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Support of RFC4996 RoHC-TCP
  From: RoHC Team, 2012-05-24
• Re: Patch to optimize WLSB memory allocation (Was: Support of RFC4996 RoHC-TCP)
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-24
• Re: Patch to optimize WLSB memory allocation (Was: Support of RFC4996 RoHC-TCP)
  From: RoHC Team, 2012-05-25
• Re: Patch to optimize WLSB memory allocation (Was: Support of RFC4996 RoHC-TCP)
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-26
• Re: Patch to optimize WLSB memory allocation (Was: Support of RFC4996 RoHC-TCP)
  From: RoHC Team, 2012-06-19
• Re: Patch to optimize WLSB memory allocation (Was: Support of RFC4996 RoHC-TCP)
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-06-22
• Re: Patch to optimize WLSB memory allocation (Was: Support of RFC4996 RoHC-TCP)
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-06-24
• Major release 1.4.0 of the ROHC library
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-17
• [Question #120866]: Status of bug #622128 changed to 'Fix Released' in trunk
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-17
• [Question #123363]: Status of bug #761955 changed to 'Fix Released' in trunk
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-17
• [Question #86662]: Status of bug #761955 changed to 'Fix Released' in trunk
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-17
• [Question #121378]: Status of bug #622402 changed to 'Fix Released' in trunk
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-17
• ROHC library 1.2.3 and 1.3.2 released
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-17
• [Question #118413]: Status of bug #609736 changed to 'Fix Released' in 1.3.x
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-17
• [Question #118413]: Status of bug #609736 changed to 'Fix Released' in 1.2.x
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-16
• Re: [Question #195881]: RTP VoIP - each Packet being compressed and in ROHC pcap twice?
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-04
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #195881]: RTP VoIP - each Packet being compressed and in ROHC pcap twice?
  From: Jim Wheeler, 2012-05-04
• [Question #195881]: RTP VoIP - each Packet being compressed and in ROHC pcap twice?
  From: Jim Wheeler, 2012-05-03
• Re: [Question #195843]: What is needed for RoHC with SIP?
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-03
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #195843]: What is needed for RoHC with SIP?
  From: Cédric Baudoin, 2012-05-04
• Re: [Question #195843]: What is needed for RoHC with SIP?
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-05
• Re: [Question #195843]: What is needed for RoHC with SIP?
  From: Cedric Baudoin, 2012-05-05
• Re: [Question #195843]: What is needed for RoHC with SIP?
  From: rolf, 2012-05-05
• Re: [Question #195843]: What is needed for RoHC with SIP?
  From: Cédric Baudoin, 2012-05-05
• Re: [Question #195843]: What is needed for RoHC with SIP?
  From: rolf, 2012-05-05
• Re: [Question #195843]: What is needed for RoHC with SIP?
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-05
• Re: [Question #195843]: What is needed for RoHC with SIP?
  From: Cedric Baudoin, 2012-05-05
• Re: [Question #195843]: What is needed for RoHC with SIP?
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-05
• [Question #195843]: What is needed for RoHC with SIP?
  From: rolf, 2012-05-03
• Re: [Question #194142]: Sending RTP across a rohctunnel
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-04-19
• Re: [Question #194142]: Sending RTP across a rohctunnel
  From: Cédric Baudoin, 2012-04-20
• Re: [Question #194142]: Sending RTP across a rohctunnel
  From: Raman Gupta, 2012-11-24
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #194142]: Sending RTP across a rohctunnel
  From: Cedric Baudoin, 2012-04-20
• Re: [Question #194142]: Sending RTP across a rohctunnel
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-11-24
• Re: [Question #194142]: Sending RTP across a rohctunnel
  From: Raman Gupta, 2013-01-17
• Re: [Question #194142]: Sending RTP across a rohctunnel
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2013-01-20
• [Question #194142]: Sending RTP across a rohctunnel
  From: Dan Benson, 2012-04-19
• Re: [Question #191386]: about MAX_FO_COUNT
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #191386]: about MAX_FO_COUNT
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-23
• [Question #191386]: about MAX_FO_COUNT
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-22
• Re: [Question #191211]: modify the feedback system in O-mode
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #191211]: modify the feedback system in O-mode
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-20
• Re: [Question #191211]: modify the feedback system in O-mode
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-20
• Re: [Question #191211]: modify the feedback system in O-mode
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-21
• Re: [Question #191211]: modify the feedback system in O-mode
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-21
• Re: [Question #191211]: modify the feedback system in O-mode
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-21
• Re: [Question #191211]: modify the feedback system in O-mode
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-21
• Re: [Question #191211]: modify the feedback system in O-mode
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-21
• Re: [Question #191211]: modify the feedback system in O-mode
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-21
• Re: [Question #191211]: modify the feedback system in O-mode
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-26
• Re: [Question #191211]: modify the feedback system in O-mode
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-27
• [Question #191211]: modify the feedback system in O-mode
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-20
• Re: [Question #191105]: when should it send a feedback in O-mode
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-19
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #191105]: when should it send a feedback in O-mode
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-19
• Re: [Question #191105]: when should it send a feedback in O-mode
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-19
• Re: [Question #191105]: when should it send a feedback in O-mode
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-19
• Re: [Question #191105]: when should it send a feedback in O-mode
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-20
• [Question #191105]: when should it send a feedback in O-mode
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-19
• Re: [Question #190426]: question about "act_on_crc_failure"
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-12
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #190426]: question about "act_on_crc_failure"
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-13
• [Question #190426]: question about "act_on_crc_failure"
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-12
• Re: [Question #78995]: How to run library regression tests ?
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-11
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #78995]: How to run library regression tests ?
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-11
• Re: [Question #78994]: How to install ROHC library ?
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-11
• Re: [Question #190324]: about pcap file "test\report\samples\ipv4\udp\rtp\voip"
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-11
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #190324]: about pcap file "test\report\samples\ipv4\udp\rtp\voip"
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-11
• [Question #190324]: about pcap file "test\report\samples\ipv4\udp\rtp\voip"
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-11
• RoHC-TCP
  From: RoHC Team, 2012-03-09
• Re: [Question #189821]: about "code_UO_packet_tail"
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-06
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #189821]: about "code_UO_packet_tail"
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-07
• [Question #189821]: about "code_UO_packet_tail"
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-03-06
• Re: [Question #187649]: Decompressor NACK feedback
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-02-13
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #187649]: Decompressor NACK feedback
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-02-13
• Re: [Question #187649]: Decompressor NACK feedback
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-19
• [Question #187649]: Decompressor NACK feedback
  From: Arne, 2012-02-13
• Question Regarding generating stats..
  From: Harshavardhan, 2012-01-26
• Re: Question Regarding generating stats..
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-02-05
• Re: [Question #183708]: about feedback header
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-01-08
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #183708]: about feedback header
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-01-09
• [Question #183708]: about feedback header
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-01-04
• Re: [Question #182908]: how can we implement rohc in ns2
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-28
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #182908]: how can we implement rohc in ns2
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2012-01-11
• [Question #182908]: how can we implement rohc in ns2
  From: astha, 2011-12-26
• Support of ESP (Profil 0x0003)
  From: RoHC Team, 2011-12-22
• Re: Support of ESP (Profil 0x0003)
  From: Cédric Baudoin, 2011-12-22
• Re: Support of ESP (Profil 0x0003)
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-01-03
• Re: Support of ESP (Profil 0x0003)
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-11
• Re: Support of ESP (Profil 0x0003)
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-29
• Message not available
  • Re: Support of ESP (Profil 0x0003)
    From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-05-31
  • Message not available
  • Re: Support of ESP (Profil 0x0003)
    From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-08-24
  • Re: Support of ESP (Profil 0x0003)
    From: RoHC Team, 2012-08-24
• Re: [Question #182259]: not able to run non regression test "make check"
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #182259]: not able to run non regression test "make check"
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-18
• [Question #182259]: Status of bug #905934 changed to 'Incomplete' in rohc
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-18
• [Question #182259]: not able to run non regression test "make check"
  From: astha, 2011-12-18
• Re: [Question #181856]: about cid type
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-14
• [Question #181856]: about cid type
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-12-14
• Re: [Question #181472]: bug when use "-o"command
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-11
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #181472]: bug when use "-o"command
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-12-13
• Re: [Question #181472]: bug when use "-o"command
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-13
• Re: [Question #181472]: bug when use "-o"command
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-12-14
• Re: [Question #181472]: bug when use "-o"command
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-14
• Re: [Question #181472]: bug when use "-o"command
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-14
• Re: [Question #181472]: bug when use "-o"command
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-12-15
• Re: [Question #181472]: bug when use "-o"command
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-16
• Re: [Question #181472]: bug when use "-o"command
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-12-20
• Re: [Question #181472]: bug when use "-o"command
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2012-01-04
• Re: [Question #181472]: bug when use "-o"command
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-11
• [Question #181472]: bug when use "-o"command
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-12-10
• Re: [Question #181462]: about feedback curr
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-10
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #181462]: about feedback curr
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-10
• Re: [Question #181462]: about feedback curr
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-10
• [Question #181462]: Status of bug #902465 changed to 'Confirmed' in trunk
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-10
• [Question #181462]: about feedback curr
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-12-10
• Re: [Question #181392]: Decompression Failing for multiple UDP stream
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-09
• [Question #181392]: Decompression Failing for multiple UDP stream
  From: Khaan, 2011-12-09
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-05
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-12-06
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-06
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-12-07
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-12-08
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-11
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-12-13
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-13
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-12-14
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-14
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-12-15
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-16
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2011-12-30
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-12-30
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: qingbaibai, 2012-01-04
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2012-01-20
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-11
• Re: [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2012-03-11
• [Question #180689]: about ntohs() on windows
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-12-02
• Re: [Question #180366]: about RTP_BIT_TYPE in config.h
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-11-29
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #180366]: about RTP_BIT_TYPE in config.h
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-11-30
• Re: [Question #180366]: about RTP_BIT_TYPE in config.h
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-11-30
• [Question #180366]: about RTP_BIT_TYPE in config.h
  From: qingbaibai, 2011-11-29
• [Question #121378]: Status of bug #622402 changed to 'Fix Committed' in trunk
  From: Didier Barvaux, 2011-11-27

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status