← Back to team overview
yade-users team mailing list archive
Thread
Date
yade-users team
Mailing list archive
Messages by thread
Messages by thread
Messages sent to the yade-users mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.
200 of 30137 messages, page
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| 20 |
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
Last
•
Next
•
Previous
•
First
Re: [Question #698825]: Yade-batch is being indeterministic
,
(continued)
Re: [Question #698825]: Yade-batch is being indeterministic
From: Rohit John, 2021-09-27
Re: [Question #698794]: Invisible data point in paraview
From: Yimsk, 2021-09-20
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698794]: Invisible data point in paraview
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-20
Re: [Question #698794]: Invisible data point in paraview
From: Yimsk, 2021-09-20
[Question #698794]: Invisible data point in paraview
From: Yimsk, 2021-09-20
[Question #698778]: Problem with imposing flux in a cavity in flow engine
From: Zoheir Khademian, 2021-09-19
Re: [Question #698777]: Material parameters of wall
From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-09-19
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698777]: Material parameters of wall
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-19
Re: [Question #698777]: Material parameters of wall
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-19
Re: [Question #698777]: Material parameters of wall
From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-09-21
[Question #698777]: Material parameters of wall
From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-09-19
[Question #698776]: questions about examples/ThermalEngine/noFlowScenario.py
From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-09-19
Re: [Question #698760]: error shared_ptr.hpp:734: typename boost
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-17
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698760]: error shared_ptr.hpp:734: typename boost
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-09-18
[Question #698760]: error shared_ptr.hpp:734: typename boost
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-09-17
[Question #698754]: Making video of pfacet clump: clump falling apart
From: Rohit John, 2021-09-16
Re: [Question #698682]: MeasureCapStress does not work
From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-09-13
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698682]: MeasureCapStress does not work
From: NgocSon-Nguyen, 2021-09-15
Re: [Question #698705]: Batch
From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-09-11
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698705]: Batch
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-12
Re: [Question #698705]: Batch
From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-09-13
Re: [Question #698705]: Batch
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-14
Re: [Question #698705]: Batch
From: Launchpad Janitor, 2021-09-29
[Question #698705]: Batch
From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-09-11
[Question #698682]: MeasureCapStress does not work
From: NgocSon-Nguyen, 2021-09-09
Re: [Question #698672]: running on a server is slower than on a PC
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-09-09
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698672]: running on a server is slower than on a PC
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-09
Re: [Question #698672]: running on a server is slower than on a PC
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-09-12
Re: [Question #698672]: running on a server is slower than on a PC
From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-09-13
Re: [Question #698672]: running on a server is slower than on a PC
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-09-13
Re: [Question #698672]: running on a server is slower than on a PC
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-14
Re: [Question #698672]: running on a server is slower than on a PC
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-09-14
Re: [Question #698672]: running on a server is slower than on a PC
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-14
Re: [Question #698672]: running on a server is slower than on a PC
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-09-26
[Question #698672]: running on a server is slower than on a PC
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-09-09
Re: [Question #698654]: libopenblas problem after updating to Ubuntu 20
From: Robert Caulk, 2021-09-07
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698654]: libopenblas problem after updating to Ubuntu 20
From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-09-07
Re: [Question #698654]: libopenblas problem after updating to Ubuntu 20
From: Manfred Hampl, 2021-09-07
Re: [Question #698654]: libopenblas problem after updating to Ubuntu 20
From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-09-07
Re: [Question #698654]: libopenblas problem after updating to Ubuntu 20
From: Manfred Hampl, 2021-09-07
Re: [Question #698654]: libopenblas problem after updating to Ubuntu 20
From: Manfred Hampl, 2021-09-07
Re: [Question #698654]: libopenblas problem after updating to Ubuntu 20
From: Anton Gladky, 2021-09-07
Re: [Question #698654]: libopenblas problem after updating to Ubuntu 20
From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-09-08
Re: [Question #698654]: libopenblas problem after updating to Ubuntu 20
From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-09-08
Re: [Question #698654]: libopenblas problem after updating to Ubuntu 20
From: Anton Gladky, 2021-09-08
[Question #698654]: libopenblas problem after updating to Ubuntu 20
From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-09-07
Re: [Question #698647]: Specify makeClumpCloud composition
From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-09-06
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698647]: Specify makeClumpCloud composition
From: Szabó Bence, 2021-09-08
Re: [Question #698647]: Specify makeClumpCloud composition
From: Szabó Bence, 2021-09-08
[Question #698647]: Specify makeClumpCloud composition
From: Szabó Bence, 2021-09-06
Re: [Question #698487]: Change boundary condition from rigid wall to periodic boundary
From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-09-06
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698487]: Change boundary condition from rigid wall to periodic boundary
From: Launchpad Janitor, 2021-09-10
Re: [Question #698592]: When using a FlowEngine, is the confining pressure of the triaxial test an effective stress?
From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-09-06
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698592]: When using a FlowEngine, is the confining pressure of the triaxial test an effective stress?
From: Robert Caulk, 2021-09-06
Re: [Question #698592]: When using a FlowEngine, is the confining pressure of the triaxial test an effective stress?
From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-10-03
Re: [Question #698635]: Clump inertia and orientation
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-04
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698635]: Clump inertia and orientation
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-04
Re: [Question #698635]: Clump inertia and orientation
From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-09-05
Re: [Question #698635]: Clump inertia and orientation
From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-09-05
[Question #698635]: Clump inertia and orientation
From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-09-04
Re: [Question #698417]: negative volume for an ordinary pore
From: Launchpad Janitor, 2021-09-03
Re: [Question #698605]: The distribution of contact normal direction and contact normal force are not uniform after isotropic consolidation
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-03
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698605]: The distribution of contact normal direction and contact normal force are not uniform after isotropic consolidation
From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-09-03
Re: [Question #698605]: The distribution of contact normal direction and contact normal force are not uniform after isotropic consolidation
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-03
Re: [Question #698605]: The distribution of contact normal direction and contact normal force are not uniform after isotropic consolidation
From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-09-05
Re: [Question #698605]: The distribution of contact normal direction and contact normal force are not uniform after isotropic consolidation
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-06
Re: [Question #698605]: The distribution of contact normal direction and contact normal force are not uniform after isotropic consolidation
From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-09-12
[Question #698605]: The distribution of contact normal direction and contact normal force are not uniform after isotropic consolidation
From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-09-02
Re: [Question #698597]: Showing value of a parameter from the Ip2_FrictMat_FrictMat_MindlinPhys
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-02
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698597]: Showing value of a parameter from the Ip2_FrictMat_FrictMat_MindlinPhys
From: Antoine FAULCONNIER, 2021-09-02
Re: [Question #698597]: Showing value of a parameter from the Ip2_FrictMat_FrictMat_MindlinPhys
From: Antoine FAULCONNIER, 2021-09-03
Re: [Question #698597]: Showing value of a parameter from the Ip2_FrictMat_FrictMat_MindlinPhys
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-03
Re: [Question #698597]: Showing value of a parameter from the Ip2_FrictMat_FrictMat_MindlinPhys
From: Antoine FAULCONNIER, 2021-09-03
Re: [Question #698597]: Showing value of a parameter from the Ip2_FrictMat_FrictMat_MindlinPhys
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-03
Re: [Question #698597]: Showing value of a parameter from the Ip2_FrictMat_FrictMat_MindlinPhys
From: Antoine FAULCONNIER, 2021-09-03
[Question #698597]: Showing value of a parameter from the Ip2_FrictMat_FrictMat_MindlinPhys
From: Antoine FAULCONNIER, 2021-09-02
Re: [Question #698594]: Triaxial test comparison between periodic boundary and rigid boundary
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-02
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698594]: Triaxial test comparison between periodic boundary and rigid boundary
From: Luc Sibille, 2021-09-02
Re: [Question #698594]: Triaxial test comparison between periodic boundary and rigid boundary
From: Leonard, 2021-09-03
Re: [Question #698594]: Triaxial test comparison between periodic boundary and rigid boundary
From: Launchpad Janitor, 2021-09-19
[Question #698594]: Triaxial test comparison between periodic boundary and rigid boundary
From: Leonard, 2021-09-01
[Question #698592]: When using a FlowEngine, is the confining pressure of the triaxial test an effective stress?
From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-09-01
Re: [Question #698585]: Force applied from disk to particle
From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-09-01
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698585]: Force applied from disk to particle
From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-09-01
Re: [Question #698585]: Force applied from disk to particle
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-02
Re: [Question #698585]: Force applied from disk to particle
From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-09-11
[Question #698585]: Force applied from disk to particle
From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-09-01
Re: [Question #698572]: Is it possible to constrain the motion of a body along a circle
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-31
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698572]: Is it possible to constrain the motion of a body along a circle
From: Rohit John, 2021-09-01
Re: [Question #698572]: Is it possible to constrain the motion of a body along a circle
From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-09-01
Re: [Question #698572]: Is it possible to constrain the motion of a body along a circle
From: Rohit John, 2021-09-02
Re: [Question #698572]: Is it possible to constrain the motion of a body along a circle
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-03
Re: [Question #698572]: Is it possible to constrain the motion of a body along a circle
From: Rohit John, 2021-09-03
Re: [Question #698572]: Is it possible to constrain the motion of a body along a circle
From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-09-04
Re: [Question #698572]: Is it possible to constrain the motion of a body along a circle
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-05
Re: [Question #698572]: Is it possible to constrain the motion of a body along a circle
From: Rohit John, 2021-09-06
Re: [Question #698572]: Is it possible to constrain the motion of a body along a circle
From: Rohit John, 2021-09-18
Re: [Question #698572]: Is it possible to constrain the motion of a body along a circle
From: Rohit John, 2021-09-18
Re: [Question #698572]: Is it possible to constrain the motion of a body along a circle
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-09-19
Re: [Question #698572]: Is it possible to constrain the motion of a body along a circle
From: Rohit John, 2021-09-21
Re: [Question #698575]: adobe illustrator installation
From: Robert Caulk, 2021-08-31
[Question #698575]: adobe illustrator installation
From: robinsin jaksin, 2021-08-31
[Question #698572]: Is it possible to constrain the motion of a body along a circle
From: Rohit John, 2021-08-30
Re: [Question #698569]: Boxfactory filling a cylinder
From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-08-30
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698569]: Boxfactory filling a cylinder
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-30
Re: [Question #698569]: Boxfactory filling a cylinder
From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-08-30
Re: [Question #698569]: Boxfactory filling a cylinder
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-30
Re: [Question #698569]: Boxfactory filling a cylinder
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-30
[Question #698569]: Boxfactory filling a cylinder
From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-08-30
Re: [Question #698566]: Confused by identificationSpheresOnJoint.py
From: Luc Scholtès, 2021-08-30
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698566]: Confused by identificationSpheresOnJoint.py
From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-08-31
Re: [Question #698566]: Confused by identificationSpheresOnJoint.py
From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-08-31
Re: [Question #698566]: Confused by identificationSpheresOnJoint.py
From: Luc Scholtès, 2021-08-31
Re: [Question #698566]: Confused by identificationSpheresOnJoint.py
From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-08-31
[Question #698566]: Confused by identificationSpheresOnJoint.py
From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-08-30
Re: [Question #698444]: REFD method with clumps
From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-08-30
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698444]: REFD method with clumps
From: panjinhong, 2021-09-10
Re: [Question #698541]: Material of particle changed in the repeated cell
From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-08-28
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698541]: Material of particle changed in the repeated cell
From: Leonard, 2021-08-30
Re: [Question #698541]: Material of particle changed in the repeated cell
From: danitatsan, 2021-08-31
[Question #698541]: Material of particle changed in the repeated cell
From: Leonard, 2021-08-28
Re: [Question #698533]: about the THM coupling
From: Robert Caulk, 2021-08-27
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698533]: about the THM coupling
From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-08-27
[Question #698533]: about the THM coupling
From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-08-27
Re: [Question #698498]: How to use cellRepeat
From: Leonard, 2021-08-25
[Question #698498]: How to use cellRepeat
From: Leonard, 2021-08-24
Re: [Question #698493]: Spheres overlap in periodic simulations
From: Andres Escobar, 2021-08-24
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698493]: Spheres overlap in periodic simulations
From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-08-28
[Question #698493]: Spheres overlap in periodic simulations
From: Andres Escobar, 2021-08-24
[Question #698487]: Change boundary condition from rigid wall to periodic boundary
From: Leonard, 2021-08-24
Re: [Question #698464]: asphalt mixture model, contact, code
From: zhangke, 2021-08-23
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698464]: asphalt mixture model, contact, code
From: zhangke, 2021-08-23
Re: [Question #698464]: asphalt mixture model, contact, code
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-23
Re: [Question #698464]: asphalt mixture model, contact, code
From: zhangke, 2021-08-23
Re: [Question #698464]: asphalt mixture model, contact, code
From: isadjkn123, 2023-09-17
Re: [Question #698464]: asphalt mixture model, contact
From: zhangke, 2021-08-23
Re: [Question #698464]: asphalt mixture model, contract
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-23
[Question #698464]: asphalt mixture model, contract
From: zhangke, 2021-08-23
Re: [Question #679515]: How to have a constant-p simulations with periodic boundary condition?
From: panjinhong, 2021-08-21
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #679515]: How to have a constant-p simulations with periodic boundary condition?
From: xujin, 2021-12-04
Re: [Question #679515]: How to have a constant-p simulations with periodic boundary condition?
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2021-12-09
[Question #698444]: REFD method with clumps
From: panjinhong, 2021-08-20
[Question #698417]: negative volume for an ordinary pore
From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-08-18
Re: [Question #698392]: I calculated the kinetic energy by E=0.5mv^2+0.5Iw^2 but it is not equal to kineticEnergy() when O.cell.velGrad is set
From: Robert Caulk, 2021-08-16
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698392]: I calculated the kinetic energy by E=0.5mv^2+0.5Iw^2 but it is not equal to kineticEnergy() when O.cell.velGrad is set
From: Yuxuan Wen, 2021-08-16
Re: [Question #698392]: I calculated the kinetic energy by E=0.5mv^2+0.5Iw^2 but it is not equal to kineticEnergy() when O.cell.velGrad is set
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-17
Re: [Question #698392]: I calculated the kinetic energy by E=0.5mv^2+0.5Iw^2 but it is not equal to kineticEnergy() when O.cell.velGrad is set
From: Yuxuan Wen, 2021-08-17
Re: [Question #698392]: I calculated the kinetic energy by E=0.5mv^2+0.5Iw^2 but it is not equal to kineticEnergy() when O.cell.velGrad is set
From: Yuxuan Wen, 2021-08-17
Re: [Question #698392]: I calculated the kinetic energy by E=0.5mv^2+0.5Iw^2 but it is not equal to kineticEnergy() when O.cell.velGrad is set
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-19
Re: [Question #698392]: I calculated the kinetic energy by E=0.5mv^2+0.5Iw^2 but it is not equal to kineticEnergy() when O.cell.velGrad is set
From: Yuxuan Wen, 2021-08-19
[Question #698392]: I calculated the kinetic energy by E=0.5mv^2+0.5Iw^2 but it is not equal to kineticEnergy() when O.cell.velGrad is set
From: Yuxuan Wen, 2021-08-16
Re: [Question #698388]: MPI with Clumps Particles
From: Robert Caulk, 2021-08-16
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698388]: MPI with Clumps Particles
From: Launchpad Janitor, 2021-08-31
Re: [Question #698388]: MPI with Clumps Particles
From: Nima Goudarzi, 2021-09-09
Re: [Question #698388]: MPI with Clumps Particles
From: Robert Caulk, 2021-09-15
Re: [Question #698388]: MPI with Clumps Particles
From: Nima Goudarzi, 2021-09-16
Re: [Question #698388]: MPI with Clumps Particles
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2021-09-21
Re: [Question #698388]: MPI with Clumps Particles
From: Nima Goudarzi, 2021-09-23
Re: [Question #698388]: MPI with Clumps Particles
From: Launchpad Janitor, 2021-10-09
[Question #698388]: MPI with Clumps Particles
From: Nima Goudarzi, 2021-08-15
Re: [Question #698377]: How to correct the strain
From: Robert Caulk, 2021-08-14
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698377]: How to correct the strain
From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-08-15
Re: [Question #698377]: How to correct the strain
From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-08-24
Re: [Question #698377]: How to correct the strain
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-24
Re: [Question #698377]: How to correct the strain
From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-08-24
Re: [Question #698377]: How to correct the strain
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-24
[Question #698377]: How to correct the strain
From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-08-14
Re: [Question #698365]: non zero incident velocity on sticking contact
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-13
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698365]: non zero incident velocity on sticking contact
From: Eleni Gerolymatou, 2021-08-13
Re: [Question #698365]: non zero incident velocity on sticking contact
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-13
Re: [Question #698365]: non zero incident velocity on sticking contact
From: Eleni Gerolymatou, 2021-08-13
Re: [Question #698365]: non zero incident velocity on sticking contact
From: Eleni Gerolymatou, 2021-08-13
Re: [Question #698365]: non zero incident velocity on sticking contact
From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-08-13
Re: [Question #698365]: non zero incident velocity on sticking contact
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-13
Re: [Question #698365]: non zero incident velocity on sticking contact
From: Eleni Gerolymatou, 2021-08-14
[Question #698365]: non zero incident velocity on sticking contact
From: Eleni Gerolymatou, 2021-08-13
Re: [Question #698346]: Why VTKExporter does not work?
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-08-13
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698346]: Why VTKExporter does not work?
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-13
Re: [Question #698346]: Why VTKExporter does not work?
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-08-13
Re: [Question #698346]: Why VTKExporter does not work?
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-13
Re: [Question #698346]: Why VTKExporter does not work?
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-13
Re: [Question #698346]: Why VTKExporter does not work?
From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-08-13
Re: [Question #698346]: Why VTKExporter does not work?
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-08-16
Re: [Question #698346]: Why VTKExporter does not work?
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-08-16
[Question #698346]: Why VTKExporter does not work?
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-08-12
Re: [Question #698301]: large scale simulations
From: Robert Caulk, 2021-08-12
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698301]: large scale simulations
From: Launchpad Janitor, 2021-08-28
Re: [Question #698173]: The incremental contact shearforce is "-" in HertzMindlin and "+" in Viscoelastic models, which is opposite with each other.
From: Launchpad Janitor, 2021-08-12
Re: [Question #698312]: explain returns of yade.utils.psd
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-10
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698312]: explain returns of yade.utils.psd
From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-08-11
Re: [Question #698312]: explain returns of yade.utils.psd
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-08-11
Re: [Question #698312]: explain returns of yade.utils.psd
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-08-11
Re: [Question #698312]: explain returns of yade.utils.psd
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-11
Re: [Question #698312]: explain returns of yade.utils.psd
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-08-11
Re: [Question #698314]: how to use class yade.wrapper.StepDisplacer((object)arg1)
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-08-10
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Question #698314]: how to use class yade.wrapper.StepDisplacer((object)arg1)
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-10
Re: [Question #698314]: how to use class yade.wrapper.StepDisplacer((object)arg1)
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-08-11
Re: [Question #698314]: how to use class yade.wrapper.StepDisplacer((object)arg1)
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-11
Re: [Question #698314]: how to use class yade.wrapper.StepDisplacer((object)arg1)
From: Mahdeyeh, 2021-08-11
Re: [Question #698314]: how to use class yade.wrapper.StepDisplacer((object)arg1)
From: Jan Stránský, 2021-08-11
200 of 30137 messages, page
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| 20 |
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
Last
•
Next
•
Previous
•
First
