yade-users team mailing list archive

1. yade-users team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the yade-users mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• Re: [Question #699998]: How to simulate small-strain triaxial compression test, (continued)
  • Re: [Question #699998]: How to simulate small-strain triaxial compression test
    From: Bruno Chareyre, 2022-01-06
  • Re: [Question #699998]: How to simulate small-strain triaxial compression test
    From: William, 2023-04-13
  • Re: [Question #699998]: How to simulate small-strain triaxial compression test
    From: Jan Stránský, 2023-04-14
  • Re: [Question #699998]: How to simulate small-strain triaxial compression test
    From: Leonard, 2023-04-14
• [Question #699998]: How to simulate small-strain triaxial compression test
  From: Leonard, 2021-12-26
• [Question #699997]: Two phase flow engine
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-26
• Re: [Question #699960]: yade::InteractionLoop::action(): assumption ‘!swap’ failure
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-22
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699960]: yade::InteractionLoop::action(): assumption ‘!swap’ failure
  From: Xue, 2021-12-22
• Re: [Question #699960]: yade::InteractionLoop::action(): assumption ‘!swap’ failure
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-22
• Re: [Question #699960]: yade::InteractionLoop::action(): assumption ‘!swap’ failure
  From: Xue, 2021-12-24
• Re: [Question #699960]: yade::InteractionLoop::action(): assumption ‘!swap’ failure
  From: Xue, 2021-12-24
• [Question #699960]: yade::InteractionLoop::action(): assumption ‘!swap’ failure
  From: Xue, 2021-12-22
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: HANS MPOYO BWISHITA, 2021-12-21
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-21
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: HANS MPOYO BWISHITA, 2021-12-21
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-21
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: HANS MPOYO BWISHITA, 2021-12-27
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-27
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2022-01-12
• Re: [Question #699937]: Change 3D inertia to 2D/1D inertia
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-12-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699937]: Change 3D inertia to 2D/1D inertia
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-20
• Re: [Question #699937]: Change 3D inertia to 2D/1D inertia
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-12-22
• Re: [Question #699937]: Change 3D inertia to 2D/1D inertia
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-22
• Re: [Question #699937]: Change 3D inertia to 2D/1D inertia
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-12-22
• [Question #699937]: Change 3D inertia to 2D/1D inertia
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-12-20
• [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: HANS MPOYO BWISHITA, 2021-12-20
• Re: [Question #699917]: "noFlowscenario.py" example not working
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-12-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699917]: "noFlowscenario.py" example not working
  From: Zoheir Khademian, 2021-12-18
• Re: [Question #699917]: "noFlowscenario.py" example not working
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-12-21
• Re: [Question #699917]: "noFlowscenario.py" example not working
  From: Zoheir Khademian, 2021-12-25
• Re: [Question #699917]: "noFlowscenario.py" example not working
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-12-26
• [Question #699917]: "noFlowscenario.py" example not working
  From: Zoheir Khademian, 2021-12-18
• Re: [Question #699908]: Project the hydraulic coupler
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-12-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699908]: Project the hydraulic coupler
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-20
• [Question #699908]: Project the hydraulic coupler
  From: HANS MPOYO BWISHITA, 2021-12-17
• Re: [Question #699902]: Project the hydraulic coupler
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-12-17
• [Question #699902]: Project the hydraulic coupler
  From: HANS MPOYO BWISHITA, 2021-12-17
• [Question #699889]: (French) projet d'un coupleur hydraulique
  From: HANS MPOYO BWISHITA, 2021-12-16
• Re: [Question #699838]: SWRC curve for fine-grained soil
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2021-12-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699838]: SWRC curve for fine-grained soil
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-15
• Re: [Question #699857]: lateral strain in uniaxial test with aabbDim()
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699857]: lateral strain in uniaxial test with aabbDim()
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-12-16
• [Question #699857]: lateral strain in uniaxial test with aabbDim()
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-12-14
• [Question #699838]: SWRC curve for fine-grained soil
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-12
• Re: [Question #699820]: Questions about engine settings
  From: Xue, 2021-12-12
• [Question #699820]: Questions about engine settings
  From: Xue, 2021-12-10
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-10
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-10
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-10
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-11
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-11
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-11
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-11
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-11
• [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-09
• New bibliograpĥic reference for Yade (please update your database)
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #699603]: getSaturation - 2PFV drainage
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-09
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Przemek, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Przemek, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Przemek, 2021-12-10
• Re: [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Przemek, 2021-12-10
• [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Przemek, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #692568]: Changing joint frictional properties for specific bodies later
  From: Wang Benxin, 2021-12-08
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #692568]: Changing joint frictional properties for specific bodies later
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #699779]: Using Hertz - Mindlin Contact Law
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-08
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699779]: Using Hertz - Mindlin Contact Law
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-08
• Re: [Question #699779]: Using Hertz - Mindlin Contact Law
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-08
• Re: [Question #699779]: Using Hertz - Mindlin Contact Law
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-09
• [Question #699779]: Using Hertz - Mindlin Contact Law
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-07
• Re: [Question #699741]: How to fix boundary walls
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-04
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699741]: How to fix boundary walls
  From: Leonard, 2021-12-05
• Re: [Question #699741]: How to fix boundary walls
  From: Leonard, 2021-12-05
• [Question #699741]: How to fix boundary walls
  From: Leonard, 2021-12-03
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: mohsen, 2021-12-05
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Anton Gladky, 2021-12-05
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Anton Gladky, 2021-12-05
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-06
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: mohsen, 2021-12-15
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-15
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: mohsen, 2021-12-20
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-20
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-20
• [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: mohsen, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-01
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-12-04
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-12-06
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-12-06
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-12-06
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-12-12
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-12-13
• [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-12-01
• Re: [Question #699697]: Python version in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-01
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699697]: Python version in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-12-01
• Re: [Question #699697]: Python version in Yade 2021.01a
  From: mohsen, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699697]: Python version in Yade 2021.01a
  From: mohsen, 2021-12-05
• Re: [Question #699697]: Python version in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-12-06
• Re: [Question #699697]: Python version in Yade 2021.01a
  From: mohsen, 2021-12-06
• Re: [Question #699697]: Python version in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2021-12-22
• Re: [Question #699698]: ERROR:root:Unable to guess python type from cxx type 'vector<shared_ptr<Interaction>>
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-12-01
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699698]: ERROR:root:Unable to guess python type from cxx type 'vector<shared_ptr<Interaction>>
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699698]: ERROR:root:Unable to guess python type from cxx type 'vector<shared_ptr<Interaction>>
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-12-06
• [Question #699698]: ERROR:root:Unable to guess python type from cxx type 'vector<shared_ptr<Interaction>>
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-12-01
• [Question #699697]: Python version in Yade 2021.01a
  From: mohsen, 2021-12-01
• Re: [Question #699653]: Selection of materials
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-11-27
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699653]: Selection of materials
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-11-29
• [Question #699653]: Selection of materials
  From: 孙灿, 2021-11-27
• Re: [Question #699645]: Simulation viewer is showing no output despite the simulation running
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-11-26
• [Question #699645]: Simulation viewer is showing no output despite the simulation running
  From: Ludwig Vogt, 2021-11-26
• Re: [Question #699605]: orthogonal packing
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-11-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699605]: orthogonal packing
  From: Fedor, 2021-11-23
• Re: [Question #699605]: orthogonal packing
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-23
• Re: [Question #699605]: orthogonal packing
  From: Fedor, 2021-11-23
• Re: [Question #699605]: orthogonal packing
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-23
• Re: [Question #699605]: orthogonal packing
  From: Fedor, 2021-11-23
• Re: [Question #699605]: orthogonal packing
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-23
• Re: [Question #699605]: orthogonal packing
  From: Fedor, 2021-11-23
• Re: [Question #699605]: orthogonal packing
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-23
• Re: [Question #699605]: orthogonal packing
  From: Fedor, 2021-11-23
• Re: [Question #699605]: orthogonal packing
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-23
• Re: [Question #699605]: orthogonal packing
  From: Fedor, 2021-11-24
• Re: [Question #699605]: orthogonal packing
  From: Fedor, 2021-11-24
• [Question #699605]: orthogonal packing
  From: Fedor, 2021-11-23
• [Question #699603]: getSaturation - 2PFV drainage
  From: Luis Barbosa, 2021-11-23
• Re: [Question #699589]: i.geom.normal is not normalized (unit) vector from the branch vector (for the case of sphere-sphere contact)
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-22
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699589]: i.geom.normal is not normalized (unit) vector from the branch vector (for the case of sphere-sphere contact)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-11-22
• Re: [Question #699589]: i.geom.normal is not normalized (unit) vector from the branch vector (for the case of sphere-sphere contact)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-11-22
• Re: [Question #699589]: i.geom.normal is not normalized (unit) vector from the branch vector (for the case of sphere-sphere contact)
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-22
• Re: [Question #699589]: i.geom.normal is not normalized (unit) vector from the branch vector (for the case of sphere-sphere contact)
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-22
• Re: [Question #699589]: i.geom.normal is not normalized (unit) vector from the branch vector (for the case of sphere-sphere contact)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-11-22
• [Question #699589]: i.geom.normal is not normalized (unit) vector from the branch vector (for the case of sphere-sphere contact)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-11-22
• Re: [Question #699581]: How to inspect the body one by one in the cloud if I have 2 files YADE separately?
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-11-22
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699581]: How to inspect the body one by one in the cloud if I have 2 files YADE separately?
  From: Defri, 2021-11-22
• Re: [Question #699581]: How to inspect the body one by one in the cloud if I have 2 files YADE separately?
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-22
• Re: [Question #699581]: How to inspect the body one by one in the cloud if I have 2 files YADE separately?
  From: Defri, 2021-11-22
• Re: [Question #699581]: How to inspect the body one by one in the cloud if I have 2 files YADE separately?
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-22
• Re: [Question #699581]: How to inspect the body one by one in the cloud if I have 2 files YADE separately?
  From: Defri, 2021-11-23
• [Question #699581]: How to inspect the body one by one in the cloud if I have 2 files YADE separately?
  From: Defri, 2021-11-21
• Re: [Question #699565]: Obtain the contact number of each particles in the primary fabric (only consider large contact force pairs)
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-11-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699565]: Obtain the contact number of each particles in the primary fabric (only consider large contact force pairs)
  From: Zheng, 2021-11-22
• [Question #699565]: Obtain the contact number of each particles in the primary fabric (only consider large contact force pairs)
  From: Zheng, 2021-11-20
• Re: [Question #699510]: How to get the resultant force on a particle
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699510]: How to get the resultant force on a particle
  From: Leonard, 2021-11-17
• [Question #699510]: How to get the resultant force on a particle
  From: Leonard, 2021-11-16
• [Question #699471]: Load and run new simulation
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699471]: Load and run new simulation
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-11-12
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699471]: Load and run new simulation
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699471]: Load and run new simulation
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699471]: Load and run new simulation
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-13
• Re: [Question #699471]: Load and run new simulation
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-11-13
• Re: [Question #699471]: Load and run new simulation
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-11-13
• Re: [Question #699471]: Load and run new simulation
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-13
• Re: [Question #699471]: Load and run new simulation
  From: lxq, 2021-11-13
• Re: [Question #699471]: Load and run new simulation
  From: lxq, 2021-11-13
• Re: [Question #699471]: Load and run new simulation
  From: lxq, 2021-11-13
• Re: [Question #699471]: Load and run new simulation
  From: lxq, 2021-11-13
• Re: [Question #699462]: Fixed some particles in a periodic cell
  From: whr, 2021-11-12
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699462]: Fixed some particles in a periodic cell
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699462]: Fixed some particles in a periodic cell
  From: whr, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699462]: Fixed some particles in a periodic cell
  From: whr, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699462]: Fixed some particles in a periodic cell
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699462]: Fixed some particles in a periodic cell
  From: whr, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699462]: Fixed some particles in a periodic cell
  From: whr, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699462]: Fixed some particles in a periodic cell
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-13
• [Question #699462]: Fixed some particles in a periodic cell
  From: whr, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699459]: Possible reasons for bond not being connected in the method of CohFrictMat
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-12
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699459]: Possible reasons for bond not being connected in the method of CohFrictMat
  From: Jingchi Yu, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699459]: Possible reasons for bond not being connected in the method of CohFrictMat
  From: Jingchi Yu, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699459]: Possible reasons for bond not being connected in the method of CohFrictMat
  From: Jingchi Yu, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699458]: about -j XX and accelerate in yadedaily
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-11-12
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699458]: about -j XX and accelerate in yadedaily
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699458]: about -j XX and accelerate in yadedaily
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699458]: about -j XX and accelerate in yadedaily
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699458]: about -j XX and accelerate in yadedaily
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-13
• Re: [Question #699458]: about -j XX and accelerate in yadedaily
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-11-13
• Re: [Question #699458]: about -j XX and accelerate in yadedaily
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-13
• Re: [Question #699458]: about -j XX and accelerate in yadedaily
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-11-14
• Re: [Question #699458]: about -j XX and accelerate in yadedaily
  From: lxq, 2021-11-14
• Re: [Question #699458]: about -j XX and accelerate in yadedaily
  From: lxq, 2021-11-14
• Re: [Question #699458]: about -j XX and accelerate in yadedaily
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-11-14
• Re: [Question #699458]: about -j XX and accelerate in yadedaily
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-11-17
• [Question #699459]: Possible reasons for bond not being connected in the method of CohFrictMat
  From: Jingchi Yu, 2021-11-12
• [Question #699458]: about -j XX and accelerate in yadedaily
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #693817]: The error about defining a CohFrictPhys bond between two different materials?
  From: Jingchi Yu, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #693672]: How to define a CohFrictPhys bond between two different materials?
  From: Jingchi Yu, 2021-11-12
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #693672]: How to define a CohFrictPhys bond between two different materials?
  From: lxq, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #693672]: How to define a CohFrictPhys bond between two different materials?
  From: lxq, 2021-11-12
• Re: [Question #699437]: save and load
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-11-11
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699437]: save and load
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-11-11

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status